Saturday, October 12, 2013

WOMAN CONTRACTS FLESH EATING BACTERIA KNOWN AS VIBRIO VULNIFICUS FROM CRABS (SEE VIDEO)

WOMAN CONTRACTS FLESH EATING BACTERIA KNOWN AS VIBRIO VULNIFICUS FROM CRABS

 





 

 

not trying to scare anyone, I love to eat crabs, but this stuff don’t play around, just like the fisherman said.

 

just have to wear some gloves when cleaning crabs and fish from now on. ...

 

 


 

 

 

31 in Fla. infected by bacteria in salt water


 

By TAMARA LUSH, Associated Press | October 11, 2013 | Updated: October 11, 2013 5:54pm

 

 


 

 

 

This photo provided by Patty Konietzky shows her husband's foot of what they thought was a bug bite on Sept. 22, 2013, in Ormond Beach, Fla. Patty and her husband, Henry "Butch" Konietzky, went crabbing in the Halifax River near Ormond Beach in September. Butch developed a sore which was later confirmed to be vibrio vulnificus. The bacteria spread quickly in his body and he died 60 hours later. ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. (AP) — Patty Konietzky thought the small purple lesion on her husband's ankle was a spider bite. But when the lesion quickly spread across his body like a constellation, she knew something wasn't right.

 

After a trip to the hospital and a day and a half later, Konietzky's 59-year-old husband was dead.

 

The diagnosis: vibrio vulnificus (vih-BREE'-oh VUHL'-nihf-ih-kus), an infection caused by a bacterium found in warm salt water. It's in the same family of bacterium that causes cholera. So far this year, 31 people across Florida have been infected by the severe strain of vibrio, and 10 have died.

 

"I thought the doctors would treat him with antibiotics and we'd go home," said Konietzky, who lives in Palm Coast, Fla. "Never in a million years it crossed my mind that this is where I'd be today."

 

State health officials say there are two ways to contract the disease: by eating raw, tainted shellfish — usually oysters — or when an open wound comes in contact with bacteria in warm seawater.

 

In Mobile, Ala., this week health department officials said two men with underlying health conditions were diagnosed with vibrio vulnificus in recent weeks. One of the men died in September and the other is hospitalized. Both men were tending to crab traps when they came into contact with seawater.

 

 While such occurrences could potentially concern officials in states with hundreds of miles of coastline and economies largely dependent on ocean-related tourism, experts say the bacteria is nothing most people should worry about. Vibrio bacteria exist normally in salt water and generally only affect people with compromised immune systems, they say. Symptoms include vomiting, diarrhea and abdominal pain. If the bacteria get into the bloodstream, they provoke symptoms including fever and chills, decreased blood pressure and blistering skin wounds.

 

But there's no need to stop swimming in the Gulf of Mexico, says Diane Holm, a spokeswoman for the state health department in Lee County, which has had a handful of cases that included one fatality this year.

 

"This is nothing abnormal," she said. "We don't believe there is any greater risk for someone to swim in the Gulf today than there was yesterday or 10 years ago."

 

There have been reports this year in Gulf states of other waterborne illnesses, but they are rare. In fresh water, the Naegleria fowleri amoeba usually feeds on bacteria in the sediment of warm lakes and rivers. If it gets high up in the nose, it can get into the brain. Cases have been reported in Louisiana, Arkansas and in Florida, including the August death of a boy in the southwestern part of the state who contracted the amoeba while knee boarding in a water-filled ditch.

 

Dr. James Oliver, a professor of biology at the University of North Carolina in Charlotte, has studied vibrio vulnificus for decades. He said that while Florida has the most cases of vibrio infection due to the warm ocean water that surrounds the state, the bacteria is found worldwide, generally in estuaries and near the coast.

 

"It's normal flora in the water," he said. "It belongs there."

 

The vast majority of people who are exposed to the bacteria don't get sick, he said. A few people become ill but recover. Only a fraction of people are violently ill and fewer still die; Oliver said many of those people ingest tainted, raw shellfish.

 

Oliver and Florida Department of Health officials say people shouldn't be afraid of going into Florida's waters, but that those with suppressed immune systems, such as people who have cancer, diabetes or cirrhosis of the liver, should be aware of the potential hazards of vibrio vulnificus, especially if they have an open wound.

 

Holm said nine people died from vibrio vulnificus in Florida in 2012, and 13 in 2011, so this year's statistics aren't alarming. What's different, she said, was that victims' families are speaking to the news media about the danger.

 

Konietzky watched as her husband Henry "Butch" Konietzky died on Sept. 23. She said she feels it's her mission to let others know about the potential risks. Next week, she and her husband's adult daughter are scheduled to appear on "The Doctors" television program to discuss the disease.

 

"We knew nothing about this bacteria," she said. Never mind that both she and her husband grew up in Florida and have spent their lives fishing and participating in other water activities.

 

The couple had gone crabbing on the Halifax River near Ormond Beach on Sept. 21, she said. Her husband first noticed the ankle lesion in the middle of that night. He didn't wake his wife, but in the morning, told her that it felt like his skin was burning near the lesion. Patty Konietzky took a photo of it and hours later, when her husband said he was in pain and the lesions had spread, they went to the emergency room.

 

Konietzky said her husband didn't have any health problems or open wounds that she knew of, and when doctors told her that he had an infection in his bloodstream, she didn't think it was too serious. Within hours, her husband's skin turned purple and it "looked like he had been beaten with a baseball bat."

 

Nearly 62 hours after he was in the water, Butch Konietzky died. His wife notes that she, too, was in the same water — yet wasn't infected.

 

"To walk around in the water and doing the things we did, you didn't give it any thought," she said.

 

Konietzky said her husband wouldn't want her — or anyone else — to stop fishing or enjoying outdoor activities because of a fear of the bacteria. Nonetheless, she wants people to be aware of the risk and is pushing her local county commission to post signs warning folks about the bacteria.

 

"I'm not going to be afraid of it," she said. "I have to personally put some meaning on the loss of my husband. And speaking out is all I can do."

 

________

 


 

Follow Tamara Lush on Twitter at http://twitter.com/tamaralush

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

Monday, October 7, 2013

 

Nine Floridians Killed, 18 Sickened by Vibrio This Year; Some Cases Linked to Oysters

 

ALSO, it’s all along the Texas coast...see;

 


 

 

 

VIBRO ALONG THE TEXAS COAST

 

 

 

Friday, June 7, 2013

 

Big Increase VIBRIO PARAHAEMOLYTICUS Along Texas Coast

 

"It is along the whole coast of Texas,"

 


 

Bacteria Death Posted: Jun 13, 2013 6:43 PM CDT <em class="wnDate">Thursday, June 13, 2013 7:43 PM EST</em>Updated: Jul 01, 2013 6:43 PM CDT <em class="wnDate">Monday, July 1, 2013 7:43 PM EST</em> By Isiah Carey, Reporter - bio

 


 

HOUSTON (FOX 26) - Eva Rutledge says, "I didn't expect it. His leg was bruised. He had a bruise on his leg how in the hell - excuse me - turn in to that. How did he lose his leg to a bruise."

 

Family members say 66 year old James Jim Rutledge of Katy was a man of few words...He was a person who loved his family and the outdoors. Rutledge's garage is filled with his hobbies from deer hunting to fishing. And his wife says fishing is what in part lead to his unexpected and shocking death.

 

"Down at his place we'd always get up at 5 am we'd run out there all the bass schooling out there you know catching them like crazy," says Eva.

 

It was last week when family members say James bruised his leg here on this homemade wooden motor stand in his garage...Then Saturday morning Eva Rutledge says he was fine and went fishing with friends.

 

Eva says, "Jim never got in the water ever since the warning years ago without waiters covering him...but you get out in the water and you're gonna get splattered no matter what."

 

When Rutledge returned home - by Saturday night his wife said he appeared to be weak. Then on Sunday Jim's leg looked like this. It was full of lesions and boils. He was rushed to the hospital.

 

Eva says, "they took him down to surgery and scraped away the skin and they said the muscle was dead and the tissue was dead and they had to go in and amputate his leg."

 

Eva says by Monday afternoon doctors believe Jim may have come into contact with Vibrio bacteria while fishing near Galveston. The organism can be found in coastal areas...it is a bacteria that could make you sick or even kill you....

 

"It just literally ate his body. It shut down one place then it went up and shut down another," says Eva.

 

By 8:00 Monday night family members say 66 year old Jim Rutledge had died...That was only two days after going fishing...Doctors tell family members he died from a form of severe infection called sepsis possibly caused by Vibrio.

 

Eva says, "that was it I lost him that was the end of him."

 

Eva is now determined to get out the word. She wants those in the community to head the warning from fishing reports. Warnings when the bacteria level is high in bodies of water around Texas.

 

She says, "it needs to be on the news people need to be warned and they need to know what they're up against."

 

In the meantime, Jim's family is planning to bury him Friday. They all say they will wear fishing shirts in his memory...a memory his wife has not come to grips with just yet.

 

"I don't believe he's gone yet. I don't know how to explain it. He's off for the weekend - he's staying with the guys it's no big deal," says Eva.

 

The family is now waiting on official answers from the Harris County Medical Examiner.

 

Signs and symptoms of Vibrio:

 

(Source: Wikipedia)

 

Vibrio vulnificus causes an infection often incurred after eating seafood, especially raw or undercooked oysters. V. vulnificus does not alter the appearance, taste, or odor of oysters. the bacteria can also enter the body through open wounds when swimming or wading in infected waters, or via puncture wounds from the spines of fish such as tilapia.

 

Symptoms include vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and a blistering dermatitis that is sometimes mistaken for pemphigus or pemphigoid.

 

V. vulnificus is eighty times more likely to spread into the bloodstream in people with compromised immune systems, especially those with chronic liver disease. When this happens, severe symptoms including blistering skin lesions, septic shock, and even death can occur. This severe infection may occur regardless of whether the infection began via contaminated food or via an open wound.

 


 


 

Dangerous Bacterial Infection Causes Alert in Corpus Christi Area Posted: Jun 4, 2013 2:17 PM by Janine Reyes Updated: Jun 4, 2013 8:55 PM

 

CORPUS CHRISTI -- A big increase in bacterial infections found in warm salt water has health officials on alert tonight. It's called Vibrio Parahaemolyticus.

 

You and your family could come in contact with the potentially dangerous bacteria.

 

Justin Bovee and his son are enjoying a day at the beach, unaware that inside the water, they could come into contact with Vibrio Parahaemolyticus.

 

"It is along the whole coast of Texas," explained Dr. William Burgin, Jr. With the Corpus Christi-Nueces County Public Health District.

 

The whole coast of texas usually sees 2-7 cases per year.

 

In Corpus Christi, in just 3 weeks, we've already seen 3 cases and that's a lot.

 

The bacteria is found in warm salt water that means you can pick it up two ways, either by swimming in infected water with an open wound or by eating the shellfish that swims in that water.

 

Bovee says he'll be more leery about eating seafood. He's not too worried about swimming in it, because he has a strong immune system. His son doesn't do much swimming. "He doesn't get in the water too much anyway, he only goes about knee deep, then he gets freaked out and goes back to the beach," Bovee said.

 

Still, dr burgin with the health department cautions that it's young people who have picked up the infection. One from eating infected food, the other two from being in the water.

 

Having cuts or scrapes will put you at a higher risk.

 

"You never know, you may go in with no scratches, but out there in the water you step on something and that breaks the skin," Burgin explained.

 

That's why it's important to stay aware, get out if you get cut and something as simple as wearing water shoes at the beach to help prevent those cuts and scrapes in the water.

 

If you catch Vibrio Haemolyticus by eating infected fish, symptoms are diarrhea, abdominal cramping, nausea and fever.

 

If you catch it by swimming in infected water, you will develop an abscess that does not respond to normal antibiotics and you'll have to see a doctor immediately.

 


 

 Intraspecific Diversity of Vibrio vulnificus in Galveston Bay Water and Oysters as Determined by Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA PCR Meilan Lin1,†, Deborah A. Payne2 and John R. Schwarz1,* + Author Affiliations

 

1Department of Marine Biology, Texas A&M University at Galveston, Galveston, Texas 77551 2Department of Pathology and Otolaryngology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555 Next Section ABSTRACT Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) PCR was used to analyze the temporal and spatial intraspecific diversity of 208 Vibrio vulnificus strains isolated from Galveston Bay water and oysters at five different sites between June 2000 and June 2001. V. vulnificus was not detected during the winter months (December through February). The densities of V. vulnificus in water and oysters were positively correlated with water temperature. Cluster analysis of RAPD PCR profiles of the 208 V. vulnificus isolates revealed a high level of intraspecific diversity among the strains. No correlation was found between the intraspecific diversity among the isolates and sampling site or source of isolation. After not being detected during the winter months, the genetic diversity of V. vulnificus strains first isolated in March was 0.9167. Beginning in April, a higher level of intraspecific diversity (0.9933) and a major shift in population structure were observed among V. vulnificus isolates. These results suggest that a great genetic diversity of V. vulnificus strains exists in Galveston Bay water and oysters and that the population structure of this species is linked to changes in environmental conditions, especially temperature.

 


 

 

 

V. vulnificus in sport fish mucus and recreational waters of south Texas

 

Lijie Shi1 Gregory W. Stunz1, Katrina V. Gordon2, Gregory W. Buck1, and Joanna B. Mott1 1Dept. of Life Sciences, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX 78412 2Dept. of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33620

 

Abstract

 

Vibrio vulnificus is a Gram-negative, motile, curved bacterium with polar flagella found naturally in marine environments and commonly associated with oysters, clams, mussels, and fish. Infection by V. vulnificus can lead to serious consequences with a mortality rate as high as 50%, and death usually occurring within 48 hours of admission to a hospital. Infection routes are either through ingestion of undercooked seafood or through a wound lesion. The majority of the infections reported in Texas coastal areas have been associated with fishing and recreational activities. In this study, levels of V. vulnificus on two commonly fished species and in the water column were measured monthly in the Aransas Bay complex. Surface mucus of spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus) and red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) and water samples were collected, and routine field parameters were recorded. V. vulnificus concentrations were determined using the species specific VVAP probe as recommended in the Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual [FDA BAM, (Kaysner and DePaola 2004)]. Enterococcus levels in the water were measured following EPA Method 1600. V. vulnificus was isolated from mucus of both species of fish and from water samples, with concentrations ranging from 101-3x103/100ml of water and mucus. Numbers in water increased with water temperature. Enterococcus levels in the water were <10 as="" associated="" cfu="" coastal="" commonly="" data="" div="" fished="" from="" handling="" health="" in="" initial="" levels="" ml.="" of="" on="" pathogen="" potential="" provided="" risks="" routine="" species="" study="" texas="" the="" this="" two="" v.="" vulnificus="" waters.="" waters="" well="" with="">
 

snip...

 

Discussion

 

The study, conducted throughout the six month period from March to August 2010, demonstrated that V. vulnificus is present in the mucus of commonly fished species in the Coastal Bend area of Texas. Concentrations in water and fish mucus of this bacterium ranged from 101 to 103 per 100ml, and as the temperature increased over the season, the concentration of bacteria also increased, with May samples being an exception. However, statistics suggested that the increase in V. vulnificus concentration was more related to salinity than temperature (P<0 .05="" a="" additional="" affected="" all="" also="" although="" an="" and="" as="" assess="" at="" be="" better="" causing="" cfu="" compounds="" concentration="" concentrations.="" concentrations="" contrast="" contribute="" did="" div="" drum="" effects.="" enterococcus="" environment="" explore="" factors="" finding="" fish="" for="" from="" generally="" genes="" handling="" health="" higher="" however="" in="" increased="" indicator="" infection="" infections="" is="" levels="" longer="" low="" may="" measured.="" ml="" mucus="" needed="" not="" of="" open="" order="" other="" outcome="" populations="" potential="" produced="" project="" quality="" red="" relate="" research="" results="" risks="" route="" sampling="" seatrout.="" seatrout="" serious="" sites="" source.="" species="" specific.="" spotted="" stress="" such="" suggest="" suggested="" temperature="" than="" that="" the="" these="" this="" to="" transmission="" used="" v.="" very="" virulence="" vulnificus="" water.="" water="" were="" which="" with="" wounds="">
 

see full text with graphic charts with different species of fish with VIBRIO VULNIFICUS ;

 


 

 

 

THE EFFECT OF HIGH-MAGNITUDE PRECIPITATION EVENTS ON VIBRIO VULNIFICUS MORBIDITY CASES IN ESTUARINE ENVIRONMENTS

 

THESIS

 

Presented to the Graduate Council of Texas State University-San Marcos in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements

 

For the Degree

 

Master of SCIENCE

 

by

 

Najeda L. Patolo, B.A. San Marcos, Texas May 2012

 

snip...

 

CHAPTER 6

 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

 

Results from the Kendall‟s Tau-b correlation analysis show that there is a clear and significantly negative correlation between precipitation and salinity in both bay systems. This result was expected based on evidence presented in past studies (Mott et al., 2008, Ramirez et al., 2008) and is also a logical result. An increase in high-magnitude precipitation events in a shallow estuarine system will cause local salinity levels to temporarily drop. Correlation analysis between precipitation and water temperature in both bay systems shows no significant relationship. It is expected that seasonality (time of the year) will be a greater determining factor for changes in water temperature. High water temperatures influence the presence of V. vulnificus, but changes to that particular variable in the area not directly correlated to precipitation events in the study area.

 

67

 

The relationship results of the Phi test for concordance or discordance between the occurrence of V. vulnificus morbidity cases and above-normal precipitation events in both bay systems are not significant. A potential source of error in this analysis is the small sample size of morbidity cases. There are only 30 reported cases identified to the Galveston Bay system and 5 for the Matagorda Bay system over a 5-year period. Perhaps repeating this study at a more coarse scale over a longer time period and using a greater sample of morbidity cases will have a different outcome.

 

As was previously stated, underreported numbers of infection may also have affected the amount of morbidity data used in this case study. It is hypothesized that analysis of the entire coastal region of Texas and geographically identified morbidity cases may result in a stronger study and possibly different results.

 

42 68 CHAPTER 7

 

FUTURE IMPLICATIONS AND STUDY

 

If global and sea surface temperatures continue to rise at the rate predicted (Patz et al. 2000), corresponding changes in the hydrologic cycle can also be expected, especially in humid-subtropical and tropical locations where water temperatures are consistently warm. Warm coastal waters will expand, resulting in sea levels rising, an increase in flood events, and larger hydrologic events in locations with sea temperatures above 26°C (Patz and Olson 2006). This rise in flood events and the resulting decrease in salinity levels may increase the geospatial range of Vibrio vulnificus.

 

Environmental changes to the coastal and estuarine ecosystems of the Texas Gulf Coast may also affect the flora and fauna, which harbor the hazardous bacteria. Future analysis of population clustering in coastal urbanized areas will give the researcher a better idea of where morbidity clusters occur, depending on where the populations are concentrated. In coastal locations where temperatures are high and salinity temperatures are moderated either by a freshwater source inland or high levels of precipitation, such

 

69

 

analysis will be useful in determining areas able to support Vibrio vulnificus growth and reproduction.

 

In the 2011 Regional Water Plan for the state of Texas, the Texas Water Development estimated a +50% rise in population for Harris County, +17% for Galveston, and +17% for Matagorda County (Table 1). These increases in the resident population combined with increased weather variability in an already environmentally sensitive ecosystem may very well be a contributing factor to the number of reported water-borne diseases in the Texas Gulf Coast. General knowledge of the bacteria is not always made readily available to the public, and specific water bodies identified that may be potentially hazardous after a heavy precipitation event are not always identifiable.

 

Over the last four decades, sufficient scientific analysis of Vibrio vulnificus has identified the specific environmental needs of the pathogen. Safety measures are taken during shellfish harboring, and information about food poisoning is readily available through the Center for Disease Control and the GCOIC. It appears, however, that those test variables may not determine when and where morbidity cases are reported. More research may need to be performed to determine specific recreational and industrial locations that are high-traffic locations during hurricane season in the study area and in the entire Texas Gulf Coast.

 

Extensive study is required to determine how much fecal coliform affects the presence of Vibrio vulnificus in order to determine potential locations within large bay

 

70

 

systems that are ideal for bacterial growth. The general migration patterns of seasonal populations may also be studied to determine if there is a connection between popular recreation locations and reported morbidity cases.

 

42 71

 

APPENDIX 1

 

MORBIDITY DATA

 

Reported Vibrio vulnificus Morbidity Cases and Sites Texas Coast (1999-2003)

 

ONSET SHELLFISH SHELLFISH SITE WOUND EXPOSURE SITE

 

Apr-99 1 E. Galveston Bay N/A

 

Apr-99 1 Galveston Bay N/A

 

May-99 1 Galveston Bay N/A

 

May-99 Unknown Unknown N/A

 

Jul-99 0 N/A Baycliff/Kemah/Texas City

 

Jul-99 0 N/A Galveston Beach

 

Jul-99 0 N/A Galveston Bay

 

Aug-99 0 N/A Aransas Pass

 

Aug-99 Unknown Unknown Unknown

 

Aug-99 Unknown Unknown Unknown

 

Aug-99 0 N/A Trinity Bay

 

Sep-99 0 N/A Galveston Bay

 

Sep-99 1 Unknown N/A

 

Jan-99 0 N/A Bay Oaks Harbor, Baytown

 

Dec-99 1 Galveston Bay N/A

 

May-00 1 Galveston Bay N/A

 

Jun-00 1 Galveston Bay N/A

 

Jul-00 0 N/A Matagorda Bay

 

Jul-00 1 Galveston Bay N/A

 

Jul-00 1 Galveston Bay N/A

 

72

 

Reported Vibrio vulnificus Morbidity Cases and Sites Texas Coast (1999-2003)

 

ONSET SHELLFISH SHELLFISH SITE WOUND EXPOSURE SITE

 

Jul-00 0 N/A Trinity Bay

 

Sep-00 1 LA N/A

 

Sep-00 1 Galveston Bay N/A

 

1-May 0 N/A Brazos River near coast

 

1-May 1 Lake MacIHAs, LA N/A

 

1-May 0 N/A Lavaca Bay

 

1-Jun 0 N/A Galveston Bay

 

1-Jun 0 N/A Canal 4 mi. NW of Raymondville

 

1-Jul 1 Galveston Bay N/A

 

1-Aug 1 Galveston Bay N/A

 

1-Aug 0 N/A Galveston Bay

 

1-Sep 0 N/A Port Lavaca

 

1-Sep 1 Unknown N/A

 

1-Oct 1 Unknown N/A

 

2-Jun 0 N/A Unknown

 

2-Jun 1 Galveston Bay N/A

 

2-Jul 1 Galveston Bay N/A

 

2-Jul Unknown Unknown Unknown

 

2-Jul 0 N/A Aransas Bay

 

2-Jul 0 N/A Unknown

 

2-Jul 0 N/A Unknown

 

2-Aug 0 N/A Matagorda Bay

 

2-Aug 0 N/A Bolivar Peninsula

 

2-Aug 0 N/A Port O'Connor

 

2-Aug 1 Unknown N/A

 

2-Sep Unknown Unknown Unknown

 

2-Sep 0 N/A Unknown

 

2-Oct 1 Unknown N/A

 

Table Continued: 73

 

Reported Vibrio vulnificus Morbidity Cases and Sites Texas Coast (1999-2003)

 

ONSET SHELLFISH SHELLFISH SITE WOUND EXPOSURE SITE

 

2-Oct 1 Galveston Bay N/A

 

3-May 0 N/A Palacios area on bay

 

3-Jun 0 N/A Galveston, West Bay

 

3-Jul 0 N/A Aransas Pass

 

3-Jul 0 N/A

 

3-Jul 0 N/A Port Arthur

 

3-Aug 1 Galveston Bay N/A

 

3-Sep 0 N/A Matagorda Bay

 

3-Oct 1 Galveston Bay N/A

 

3-Oct 1 Galveston Bay N/A

 

3-Nov 1 Unknown N/A

 

3-Nov 1 Galveston Bay N/A

 

snip...see full text ;

 


 

 Tompkins: Dangers of deadly bacteria in state's saltwater By Shannon Tompkins | June 27, 2012 | Updated: June 28, 2012 12:37pm

 

snip...

 

Through June 20 of this year, six cases of vibrio vulnificus infections have been reported to TDSHS. Cases of vibrio vulnificus infections typically peak in July and August. Vibrio vulnificus infection cases/deaths reported to Texas Department of State Health Services, 2007-11:

 

Shellfish consumption Water contact Other/unknown Total

 

Year Cases Deaths Cases Deaths Cases Deaths Cases Deaths

 

2011 7 2 6 0 4 2 17 4

 

2010 10 2 16 5 6 1 32 8

 

2009 11 6 6 1 2 1 19 8

 

2008 7 4 5 1 5 2 17 7

 

2007 12 7 11 0 3 1 26 8

 

Source: Texas Department of State Health ServicesHouston Chronicle

 

 


 

 


 

 

 

 
TSS

Monday, October 7, 2013

Nine Floridians Killed, 18 Sickened by Vibrio This Year; Some Cases Linked to Oysters

Nine Floridians Killed, 18 Sickened by Vibrio This Year; Some Cases Linked to Oysters

 

By James Andrews | October 7, 2013

 

At least 27 Floridians have been sickened this year – and nine have died– from infections of Vibrio vulnificus, a deadly bacterium that lives in warm seawater and is commonly associated with eating raw oysters and other shellfish. The figure came from a news release published last week by the Florida Department of Health.

 

 Of the nine who died, three are known to have contracted Vibrio infections from eating oysters. Another four cases were likely caused by exposure to seawater, possibly with open wounds becoming infected by Vibrio bacteria. The exposure history of the remaining two deaths was unknown.

 

 Of the 18 victims who survived, two reported eating raw oysters, while two had unknown exposures. The remaining 14 had some type of wound with exposure to seawater, according to a spokeswoman for the health department.

 

 Beyond avoiding eating raw shellfish, the health department cautioned that this was also an important reminder to avoid swimming in warm or brackish seawater with an open wound.

 

 The health department supplied this tally of the number of Vibrio cases and deaths reported in Florida each year since 2008:

 

2008: 15 cases, 5 deaths 2009: 24 cases, 7 deaths 2010: 32 cases, 10 deaths 2011: 35 cases, 13 deaths 2012: 27 cases, 9 deaths 2013: 27 cases, 9 deaths (as of Oct. 1)

 

When ingested, Vibrio can cause severe diarrhea, vomiting and abdominal pain. Wounds infected with Vibrio may lead to skin breakdown and ulcers.

 

If Vibrio enters the bloodstream, it can caused fevers, chills, decreased blood pressure and blistering skin lesions. Bloodstream Vibrio infections have a 50-percent mortality rate.

 

Individuals with weakened immune systems, such as the elderly or children, are much more susceptible to severe Vibrio infections and are advised to avoid eating raw shellfish.

 

According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in 2012 Vibrio cases in the U.S. increased by 43 percent compared to a study period covering 2006-2008.

 

Vibrio is also the most underreported foodborne pathogen, according to CDC. For every case of Vibrio infection that gets diagnosed, the agency estimates another 142 cases go undiagnosed.

 

 For more information on Vibrio, Food Safety News published a report on Sept. 23 entitled, “Emerging Pathogens: Vibrio Cases in Oysters Expected to Continue Increasing.”

 

© Food Safety News

 

More Headlines from Foodborne Illness Investigations »

 

Tags: Florida, oysters, Vibrio

 


 

 

Browse: Home / Features, Story Ideas / Information on Vibrio Vulnificus Information on Vibrio Vulnificus By editor01 on October 1, 2013

 

 

VIDEO: Dr. Carina Blackmore speaks on Vibrio Vulnificus Vibrio Vulnificus Update 10.03.13

 

County Total Cases Deaths

 

BREVARD 2 0

 

BROWARD 4 2

 

DUVAL 1 0

 

FLAGLER 1 1

 

GLADES 1 1

 

HERNANDO 1 0

 

HILLSBOROUGH 3 0

 

LEE 1 1

 

LEON 1 1

 

MANATEE 2 0

 

MARION 1 0

 

MONROE 1 1

 

NASSAU 1 0

 

OKALOOSA 1 1

 

PINELLAS 1 0

 

ST. JOHNS 1 0

 

SUWANNEE 1 0

 

VOLUSIA 2 0

 

WALTON 1 1

 

Total: 27 9

 

 Frequently Asked Questions: Vibrio vulnificus

 

DOWNLOAD PDF: Frequently Asked Questions: Vibrio vulnificus

 

What is Vibrio vulnificus?

 

Vibrio vulnificus is a bacterium that normally lives in warm seawater and is part of a group of vibrios that are called “halophilic” because they require salt.How do persons get infected with Vibrio vulnificus?

 

People can get infected with Vibrio vulnificus when they eat raw shellfish, particularly oysters. The bacterium is frequently isolated from oysters and other shellfish in warm coastal waters during the summer months. Since it is naturally found in warm marine waters, people with open wounds can be exposed to Vibrio vulnificus through direct contact with seawater. There is no evidence of person-to-person transmission of Vibrio vulnificus.

 

How can Vibrio vulnificus infection be diagnosed?

 

Vibrio vulnificus infection is diagnosed by stool, wound, or blood cultures. Notifying the laboratory when this infection is suspected helps because a special growth medium should be used to increase the diagnostic yield. Doctors should have a high suspicion for this organism when patients present with stomach illness, fever or shock following the ingestion of raw seafood, especially oysters, or with a wound infection after exposure to seawater.

 

What type of illness does Vibrio vulnificus cause?

 

Vibrio vulnificus can cause disease in those who eat contaminated seafood or have an open wound that is exposed to warm seawater containing the bacteria. Ingestion of Vibrio vulnificus can cause vomiting, diarrhea and abdominal pain.

 

Vibrio vulnificus can also cause an infection of the skin when open wounds are exposed to warm seawater;

 

these infections may lead to skin breakdown and ulcers.

 

Healthy individuals typically develop a mild disease;

 

however Vibrio vulnificus infections can be a serious concern for people who have weakened immune systems, particularly those with chronic liver disease. The bacterium can invade the bloodstream, causing a severe and life-threatening illness with symptoms like fever, chills, decreased blood pressure (septic shock) and blistering skin lesions.

 

Vibrio vulnificus bloodstream infections are fatal about 50 percent of the time.

 

A recent study showed that people with these pre-existing medical conditions were 80 times more likely to develop Vibrio vulnificus bloodstream infections than healthy people. Wound infections may also be serious in people with weakened immune systems. The wound may heal poorly and require surgery. Sometimes amputation may even be needed for recovery.

 

How common is Vibrio vulnificus infection?

 

Vibrio vulnificus is a rare cause of disease, but it is also underreported. Between 1988 and 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) received reports of more than 900 Vibrio vulnificus infections from the Gulf Coast states, where most cases occur. Before 2007, there was no national surveillance system for Vibrio vulnificus, but CDC collaborated with Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Texas and Mississippi to monitor the number of cases in the Gulf Coast region. In 2007, infections caused by Vibrio vulnificus and other vibrio species became nationally notifiable.

 

What are some tips for preventing Vibrio vulnificus infections?

 

Do not eat raw oysters or other raw shellfish. Cook shellfish (oysters, clams, mussels) thoroughly. For shellfish in the shell, either

 

a) boil until the shells open and continue boiling for 5 more minutes, or

 

b) steam until the shells open and then continue cooking for 9 more minutes.

 

Do not eat those shellfish that do not open during cooking.

 

Boil shucked oysters at least 3 minutes, or fry them in oil at least 10 minutes at 375°F.

 

Avoid cross-contamination of cooked seafood and other foods with raw seafood and juices from raw seafood.

 

Eat shellfish promptly after cooking and refrigerate leftovers.

 

Avoid exposure of open wounds or broken skin to warm salt or brackish water, or to raw shellfish harvested from such waters.

 

Wear protective clothing (e.g., gloves) when handling raw shellfish.

 

How is Vibrio vulnificus infection treated?

 

If Vibrio vulnificus is suspected, treatment should be initiated immediately because antibiotics improve survival. Aggressive attention should be given to the wound site; for patients with wound infections, amputation of the infected limb is sometimes necessary.

 

For more information on care and treatment specifics, please visit the CDC’s website.Information about the potential dangers of raw oyster consumption is available 24 hours a day from the FDA’s Seafood Hotline – 1-800-332-4010For more information on Vibrio vulnificus, visit the CDC’s website.

 

Below is a breakdown of cases in Florida since 2008:

 

2008 = 15 cases, 5 deaths

 

2009 = 24 cases, 7 deaths

 

2010 = 32 cases, 10 deaths

 

2011 = 35 cases, 13 deaths

 

2012 = 27 cases, 9 deaths

 

2013 = so far 27 cases, 9 deaths and of those deaths:

 

2 – unable to determine exposure history

 

3 – consumed raw oysters

 

4 – likely exposure to seawater

 

2013 deaths occurred in the following counties:

 

Broward (2 qty.)

 

Flagler

 

Glades

 

Lee

 

Leon

 

Monroe

 

Okaloosa

 

Walton

 

editor01

 

 


 

 

 

 

Friday, June 7, 2013

 

Big Increase VIBRIO PARAHAEMOLYTICUS Along Texas Coast

 

"It is along the whole coast of Texas,"

 


 

 

 

TSS

Thursday, September 26, 2013

Deep-Sea Benthic Footprint of the Deepwater Horizon Blowout

Research Article

 

 

Deep-Sea Benthic Footprint of the Deepwater Horizon Blowout

 

 

Paul A. Montagna mail, * E-mail: paul.montagna@tamucc.edu

 

Affiliation: Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, Texas, United States of America

 

X Jeffrey G. Baguley, Affiliation: Department of Biology, University of Nevada-Reno, Reno, Nevada, United States of America

 

X Cynthia Cooksey, Affiliation: National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America

 

X Ian Hartwell, Affiliation: National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America

 

X Larry J. Hyde, Affiliation: Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, Texas, United States of America

 

X Jeffrey L. Hyland, Affiliation: National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America

 

X Richard D. Kalke, Affiliation: Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, Texas, United States of America

 

X Laura M. Kracker, Affiliation: National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America

 

X Michael Reuscher, Affiliation: Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, Texas, United States of America

 

X Adelaide C. E. Rhodes Affiliation: Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, Texas, United States of America

 

X

 

 

Abstract
 
 
The Deepwater Horizon (DWH) accident in the northern Gulf of Mexico occurred on April 20, 2010 at a water depth of 1525 meters, and a deep-sea plume was detected within one month. Oil contacted and persisted in parts of the bottom of the deep-sea in the Gulf of Mexico. As part of the response to the accident, monitoring cruises were deployed in fall 2010 to measure potential impacts on the two main soft-bottom benthic invertebrate groups: macrofauna and meiofauna. Sediment was collected using a multicorer so that samples for chemical, physical and biological analyses could be taken simultaneously and analyzed using multivariate methods. The footprint of the oil spill was identified by creating a new variable with principal components analysis where the first factor was indicative of the oil spill impacts and this new variable mapped in a geographic information system to identify the area of the oil spill footprint. The most severe relative reduction of faunal abundance and diversity extended to 3 km from the wellhead in all directions covering an area about 24 km2. Moderate impacts were observed up to 17 km towards the southwest and 8.5 km towards the northeast of the wellhead, covering an area 148 km2. Benthic effects were correlated to total petroleum hydrocarbon, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and barium concentrations, and distance to the wellhead; but not distance to hydrocarbon seeps. Thus, benthic effects are more likely due to the oil spill, and not natural hydrocarbon seepage. Recovery rates in the deep sea are likely to be slow, on the order of decades or longer.

 

 

Citation: Montagna PA, Baguley JG, Cooksey C, Hartwell I, Hyde LJ, et al. (2013) Deep-Sea Benthic Footprint of the Deepwater Horizon Blowout. PLoS ONE 8(8): e70540. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070540

 

 

Editor: Fabiano Thompson, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

 

 

Received: January 11, 2013; Accepted: June 20, 2013; Published: August 7, 2013

 

 

Copyright: © 2013 Montagna et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

 

 

Funding: Sample collection during cruises on board R/V Gyre and R/V Ocean Veritas during the Response phase was funded by BP and NOAA as part of the DWH Response effort through funds from BP under the direction of the DWH Unified Area Command (UAC). Sample analysis and production of this paper was funded in part by contract DG133C06NC1729 from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) via subcontract 1050-TAMUCC from Industrial Economics as part of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA). Christopher Lewis (Industrial Economics, Inc.) and Rob Ricker (NOAA) reviewed and commented on earlier versions of the manuscript. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA or any of its personnel. The study design and scope of work for the present deep-water/soft-bottom benthic study was approved jointly by representatives of the DWH NRDA Trustees and BP; neither party had a role in the corresponding sample processing, data analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Pre-approval to submit the manuscript for publication was provided by representatives of the NRDA Trustees.

 

 

Competing interests: The authors have the following interests. Sample collection during cruises on board R/V Gyre and R/V Ocean Veritas during the Response phase was partly funded by BP as part of the DWH Response effort through funds from BP under the direction of the DWH Unified Area Command (UAC). Christopher Lewis (Industrial Economics, Inc.) reviewed and commented on earlier versions of the manuscript. The study design and scope of work for the present deep-water/soft-bottom benthic study was approved jointly by representatives of the DWH NRDA Trustees and BP. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, as detailed online in the guide for authors.

 

 

 snip...

 

 

Discussion Diversity and community structure are often used as bioindicators of community integrity. Since its proposal [21], the N:C ratio has been regarded as a useful indicator of organic enrichment and pollution. While the N:C ratio may vary seasonally due to natural fluctuations in food availability [22] and sediment granulometry [23], it has worked well to classify impacts of pollution and organic enrichment in field and mesocosm studies [24], [25], [26]. More recently, and arguably more relevant to the current study, the N:C has worked well to classify impacts of drilling activities in the Gulf of Mexico [16]. While natural seasonal pulses of surfaced-derived primary production could elevate nematode dominance in deep-sea meiobenthic communities, it is unlikely that seasonality enhanced N:C in the region of the MC252 wellhead relative to more distant stations at the same depth and in the same general region of the Gulf of Mexico. Sediment granulometry is nearly constant at all stations investigated in the current study with >90% silt/clay, and therefore granulometry is not likely to have an effect on N:C here. Finally, prior surveys of the meiofauna community throughout the entire northern Gulf of Mexico deep sea revealed a Gulf-wide N:C mean of 5.7±1.8 across 5 replicate core samples taken from 51 stations ranging in depth from 200–3500 m [17], [27].

 

 

Strong positive correlations of N:C, PAH, TPH, and Ba indicate that contaminants are correlated to benthic community change in soft-bottom benthos, and this was reflected in positive scores on the PC1 axis (Fig. 1). The strong inverse correlations between measures of contaminants and diversity (Mei_N1 and Mac_N1) on PC1 provide additional evidence of such impacts. Together these results indicate that PC1 can be used as a new variable to depict the footprint of oil-spill impacts to the benthos and loss of ecological integrity. Thus PC1 defines the chemical and biological footprint of the oil spill.

 

 

The hydrocarbon flow rate from the DWH wellhead is estimated to have been approximately 10.1±2.0×106 kg/day [3] and as much as 35% of released oil may have entered the observed deep-sea plume. Model simulations of hydrocarbon trajectories in the deep-sea indicate a potential for variable flow paths at different depths [28]. However, direct tracking of the plume and observed oxygen anomalies in the water column follow an overall trajectory to the southwest [29], [30] at depths of 1100–1200 m, concordant with predominant deep-water currents at that depth. The deep-sea oil plume was as much as 200 m thick and 2 km wide in some locations providing a potential mechanism for transfer of DWH hydrocarbons to deep-sea communities [29].

 

 

Several studies have reported on the observed oxygen anomaly in the deep-sea plume, and the data suggest hydrocarbon-mediated enrichment of indigenous bacteria within the water column [30], [31], [32]. Similar increases in bacterial abundance and gene expression have been observed in both deep-sea plume and coastal marsh investigations [31], [33], [34]. Bacterial blooms may have resulted in increased dissolved or particulate organic matter flux to deep-sea sediments, which could possibly enrich benthic communities. While there have been several coastal studies of benthic microbial dynamics [34], [35], we are not aware of any deep-sea sediment microbial studies published to date. In fact, it has already been pointed out that the initial round of studies of the DWH incident were lacking in deep-sea studies [4].

 

 

Increased N:C ratios at stations inside of 15 km from the wellhead indicate that meiofauna communities exhibited disproportionately high nematode abundance and dominance in comparison to more distant stations, which is consistent with an organic enrichment hypothesis. It is not likely that total organic carbon (TOC) is the enrichment driver because it does not vary much among the stations and did not explain variance when added to the PCA. The increase in nematode abundance relative to harpacticoid abundance may be the first evidence for a community-level trophic response to the possibility that the DWH spill enriched indigenous bacteria, which would then be available as food for deep-sea infauna. However, the total number of harpacticoids decreased where nematodes increased, and while we did not measure sedimentation, it is possible that some infauna was smothered or covered by spilled oil as well.

 

 

It is apparent that the Deepwater Horizon blow out and subsequent oil spill did adversely affect deep-sea soft-sediment benthos. How long will community recovery take? Little is known about deep-sea infaunal community recruitment rates or succession following a disturbance, especially one with lingering contamination of the substrate. In situ experiments indicate that deep-sea communities are slow to recolonize clean azoic sediments, taking on the order of years or longer [36]. Full recovery at impacted stations will require degradation or burial of DWH-derived contaminants in combination with naturally slow successional processes. Oil degradation in the marine environment is limited by temperature, nutrient availability (especially nitrogen and phosphorous), biodegradability of the petroleum hydrocarbons, presence of organic carbon, and the presence of microorganisms with oil degrading enzymes [37], [38]. Recovery of soft-bottom benthos after previous shallow-water oil spills has been documented to take years to decades [39], [40]. In the deep-sea, temperature is uniformly around 4°C, and TOC and nutrient concentrations are low, so it is likely that hydrocarbons in sediments will degrade more slowly than in the water column or at the surface. Also, metabolic rates of benthos in the deep-sea are very slow and turnover times are very long [41], [42]. Given deep-sea conditions, it is possible that recovery of deep-sea soft-bottom habitat and the associated communities in the vicinity of the DWH blowout will take decades or longer.

 

 

Supporting Information

 

 


 

 

 

 

Gulf Oil Spill Recovery Could Take Decades For Deep-Sea Ecosystem, Study Finds
 
 
Reuters | Posted: 09/24/2013 5:09 pm EDT

 

 
WASHINGTON, Sept 24 (Reuters) - The muddy deep-sea ecosystem around the massive 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill could take decades to recover from the effects of the disaster, researchers reported on Tuesday.

 

The oil spill from BP Plc's Macondo well had its most severe impact on the ecosystem in an area about nine square miles (24 square km) around the wellhead, the report in the online scientific journal PLoS One said.

 

Moderate effects were seen at 57 square miles (148 square km). The sea bottom's rich biodiversity was greatly reduced by the oil plume, which was up to 200 yards (183 meters) thick and 1.2 miles (1.9 km) wide, it said.

 

"Given deep-sea conditions, it is possible that recovery of deep-sea soft-bottom habitat and the associated communities in the vicinity of the DWH blowout will take decades or longer," the report concluded.

 

The April 20, 2010 disaster aboard the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig killed 11 workers and ruptured the Macondo well, triggering the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history.

 

The research was carried out for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Paul Montagna, an ecosystems professor at Texas A&M University, said on NOAA's website that normally pollution was found within 300 to 600 yards (meters) of an offshore well.

 

In the Macondo case, it was found nearly two miles (3.2 km) from the well, he said.

 

Jeff Baguley, an expert on tiny marine and freshwater invertebrates from the University of Nevada, said on the NOAA website that the samples showed that the dominant group in affected areas had become nematode worms.

 

The research team included members from University of Nevada-Reno, Texas A&M, NOAA's National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science and representatives from BP.

 

 


 

 

BP should be banned from working in North America, and around the globe, in my opinion, for gross negligence. after polluting the gulf of Mexico, for 40 days and 40 nights BP spewed benzene into the air we breath where I live, without even a word to the public, until they got caught. ...

 

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

 

Report challenges state pollutant de-listing effort in Texas City

 

 


 

 


 

 

 

TSS

 

 

Friday, August 30, 2013

NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENT AND NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING FOR AN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TO ADDRESS BACTERIA IN DICKINSON BAYOU AND THREE TIDAL TRIBUTARIES Singeltary comment submission

NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENT AND NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING FOR AN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TO ADDRESS BACTERIA IN DICKINSON BAYOU AND THREE TIDAL TRIBUTARIES Singeltary comment submission
 

 
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 12:56 PM
Subject: NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENT AND NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING FOR AN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TO ADDRESS BACTERIA IN DICKINSON BAYOU AND THREE TIDAL TRIBUTARIES
 

NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENT AND NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING FOR AN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TO ADDRESS BACTERIA IN DICKINSON BAYOU AND THREE TIDAL TRIBUTARIES
 
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ or commission) has made available for public comment a draft Implementation Plan for Eight Total Maximum Daily Loads for Indicator Bacteria in Dickinson Bayou and Three Tidal Tributaries.
 
The purpose of the public meeting is to provide the public an opportunity to comment on the draft Implementation Plan for Eight Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for Indicator Bacteria in Dickinson Bayou and Three Tidal Tributaries in Brazoria and Galveston Counties.
 
The Implementation Plan is a flexible tool that governmental agencies and non-governmental organizations involved in TMDL implementation will use to guide their program management. The commission requests comment on each of the major components of the Implementation Plan: description of control actions and management measures, implementation strategy and tracking, review strategy, and communication strategy. After the public comment period, TCEQ may revise the draft Implementation Plan, if appropriate. The final Implementation Plan will then be considered for approval by the commission. Upon approval of the Implementation Plan by the commission, the Implementation Plan will be made available on the TCEQ Web site.
 
A public comment meeting for the draft Implementation Plan will be held on September 12, 2013, at 6:30 p.m., at City of Dickinson, City Council Chambers, 4403 Highway 3, Dickinson, Texas 77539.
 
At this meeting, individuals have the opportunity to present oral statements when called upon in order of registration. An agency staff member will give a brief presentation at the start of the meeting and will be available to answer questions before and after all public comments have been received. Written comments should be submitted to Roger Miranda, Water Quality Planning Division, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, MC 203, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas, 78711-3087 or faxed to (512) 239-1414. Comments may be submitted electronically to www5.tceq. texas.gov/rules/ecomments by midnight on October 7, 2013, and should reference the Implementation Plan for Eight Total Maximum Daily Loads for Indicator Bacteria in Dickinson Bayou and Three Tidal Tributaries.
 
For further information regarding the proposed Implementation Plan, please contact Roger Miranda at (512) 239-6278 or Roger.Miranda@tceq.texas.gov. Copies of the draft Implementation Plan will be available and can be obtained via the commission's Web site at: www.tceq.texas.gov/implementation/water/tmdl/tmdlnews.html or by calling (512) 239-6682.
 
Persons with disabilities who have special communication or other
 
 
 
NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENT AND NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING FOR AN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TO ADDRESS BACTERIA IN DICKINSON BAYOU AND THREE TIDAL TRIBUTARIES
 
 
Adopted February 8, 2012Approved by EPA June 6, 2012
 
Implementation Plan for Eight Total Maximum Daily Loads for Indicator Bacteria in Dickinson Bayou and Three Tidal Tributaries
 
 
 
 
Adopted February 8, 2012 Approved by EPA June 6, 2012
 
Implementation Plan for Eight Total Maximum Daily Loads for Indicator Bacteria in Dickinson Bayou and Three Tidal Tributaries
 
 
 
 
Greetings TCEQ et al,
 
I would kindly like to comment on this NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENT AND NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING FOR AN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TO ADDRESS BACTERIA IN DICKINSON BAYOU AND THREE TIDAL TRIBUTARIES, and my comments are as follows. please be advised that I tried submitting this comment to ;
 
 
 
it said it would not accept any html, Error Message: Please do not use HTML in the body of your comments.
 
and even after removing all the html links, the form still would not let me submit. so I submit my comments to you as follows ;
 
 
 
NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENT AND NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING FOR AN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TO ADDRESS BACTERIA IN DICKINSON BAYOU AND THREE TIDAL TRIBUTARIES
 
 
Singeltary Comment ;
 
 
The TCEQ efforts to bring back quality water, instead of polluted water to the Dickinson Bayou and it’s Tributaries, are greatly appreciated. However, I think it all will be futile, IF the Dickinson Bayou is not dredged out to where the water can flow freely with the tidal movements.
 
We all know that Dickinson Bayou is and has been blocked up for some time. Dickinson Bayou is like peeing in your own bathtub. eventually, you have to pull the plug. the water has been bad for some time due to not much tidal movement in and out of the spillway inlet and outlet. Via the FOIA, I received the HL&P construction permits back in the 60’s, and the dredging that the Army Corp of engineers said would come, and be maintained constantly, never happened. This constant maintaining of a dredge was to be done all the way to the ship channel, to prevent just what has happened, and it says so in the permit. In my opinion, all the precautions put forth in this plan, will be futile and for nothing, IF this dredge is not finally done, and I mean properly, all the way to the ship channel, as was stipulated in the permit, and maintained. just look at the problems in the past we have had with flounder fish kills along the Bacliff and San Leon Shore Lines, and fish kills inside of Dickinson Bayou. something is wrong, something has been wrong for years, and I believe that due to Dickinson Bayou not being dredged and maintained properly, to allow for a maximum flow, by HL&P is/was a cause to a great many of our problems in Dickinson Bayou, and surrounding waters. I also believe that HL&P should foot the total bill for this, or the Army Corp of engineers, for not making sure HL&P maintained the dredge over the past 5 decades or so. ...
 
 
Thank You,
 
Kindest Regards,
 
Terry S. Singeltary Sr. P.O. Box 42 Bacliff, Texas 77518 flounder9@verizon.net
 
 
 
Tuesday, January 8, 2013
 
Dickinson Bayou: A TMDL Project and Use Assessment for Bacteria Troubled Waters
 
Dickinson Bayou: A TMDL Project and Use Assessment for Bacteria
 
 
 
Saturday, August 11, 2012
 
Galveston County BACLIFF TEXAS FLOUNDER FISH KILL MASSIVE AUGUST 11, 2012
 
(see video of the dead flounder floating)
 
 
 
VIDEO FLOUNDER KILL
 
 
Galveston County BACLIFF TEXAS FLOUNDER FISH KILL MASSIVE AUGUST 11, 2012
 
see video of massive flounder kill with Seabreeze article September 6, 2012 ; Thousands of Flounder Killed on San Leon Bacliff Shoreline (AGAIN)
 
 
 
 
additional sources for flounder kill video;
 
 
 
 
September 6, 2012
 
 
 
Thousands of Flounder Killed on San Leon Bacliff Shoreline (AGAIN)
 
There was a major flounder kill on August 12th, 2012. Flounder up to 4 pounds were floating down the shoreline of the San Leon/Bacliff area. “This is the 6th year in a row that this has happened” said angry Bacliff resident, Terry Singletary. He said, “I’ve reported it to the Texas Parks and Wildlife in 2010, 2011 and of course this year in 2012. It is not the red tide.” I agree with him. He also reported it to the Galveston Bay Foundation. Their representative told Singletary that they were very concerned and that they would look into it. As of press time, he has not heard back from them.
 
The only thing killed and floating this year again was thousands of flounder. The red tide kills a variety of fish. Mr. Singletary reported to the Seabreeze, along with resident Robert Redfield last year, and we reported on it. This year Singletary reported it to the Texas Parks and Wildlife in Dickinson and also to the T.P & W. laboratory on Todville Road. He has pictures and videos. He talked to the Dickinson office of Texas Parks and Wildlife on August 14th and on the same day he sent them pictures and a video. Three days later they returned his call. They tried to convince him, like they did in 2010, that it is a blue algae bloom. Singletary asked them if they saw the video. The biologist said they have not even looked at it. He called the laboratory on Todville and they did not even want him to send them the video. The lady said, “If we want to look at the video we will ask you for it at a later date.” Two weeks later they are still not interested.
 
The flounder kill appears to have started around the HL&P Spillway mouth dumping into Galveston Bay. This morning as this paper was being printed, I was in my boat with a representative from an independent lab catching mud samples from each end of the H.L.& P. canal. We do not know where the contamination is coming from but at least we are doing something about it unlike the Texas Parks and Wildlife who are once again sitting on their ass doing nothing.
 
As we reach press time, September the 5th, we are waiting on the results of these samples. We already know that the H.L.&P. canal was not dug to the specifications of the original permit. The canal was required to tie into Dickinson Bayou on one end and they were to dig the Bayou out wide and 18 feet deep all the way to the channel. This side called the “inlet” side of the canal was not properly dug according to the permit. Two miles up from the Dickinson Bayou bridge, the bayou runs 20 feet deep or more. On the “Bay” side of the Dickinson Bayou bridge it averages 8 feet in depth. As anybody should know, water does not run uphill. So, all containments would stay in the bayou unable to escape. A good question would be who was overseeing the digging of the H.L.&P. canal and why did no one catch this colossal mistake? Or was it a mistake at all?
 
As of this time we have not jumped to any conclusions and we are not saying that the canal is at fault for the flounder kills. We will have to wait until the sample results are returned.
 
Dickinson Bayou is almost completely dead. The state has posted signs at all boat ramps saying do not eat fish from this bayou or swim in the water. Does this sound like a healthy vibrant bayou to you? We have been fighting a new sewer plant proposed to dump an additional one million gallons per day of treated water into Dickinson Bayou. Do you think this bayou can take any more abuse and survive? What do you readers think of this? Your comments would be greatly appreciated.
 
We will be reporting on this next month as we know more.
 
Steve
 
 
 
On May 10, 1972, Mr. D. E. Simmons, Vice President of Environmental and Inter-Utility Affairs for Houston Lighting and Power stated in writing to the Corp of Engineers that
 
 
"continued maintenance is planned." In response, the Corp of Engineers issued a Public Notice on November 9, 1972 announcing plans for the HL&P proposals which included the obligation for the utility company to perform continued maintenance dredging. It was understood and agreed upon that the utility would maintain the canal by periodically dredging it and the adjoining bayou, in order to prevent what has now happened. As stated earlier, no such dredging has ever been performed since that 1972 statement. Due to the fact that the dredging maintenance was never performed, the HL&P canal and Dickinson Bayou have both filled in on the ends. This has caused what is called a ''Hydraulic Effect". Hydraulic Effect on Dickinson Bayou means the bayou is twenty-five to thirty feet deep until it gets close to the bay where it shoals to just six or eight feet. That that the bayou cannot ever flow correctly and get properly flushed out. All of the sediment from runoff collects into the mud of the bayou (ie: fertilizer, pesticides, and the waste from the sewer plants.) If the mouth of this bayou and both sides of the HL&P canal were continually dredged as stipulated in the original permit, this hydraulic effect would not be in play. If the bayou was dredged as stipulated in the permit, the lab analyst said that Dickinson Bayou would healing itself immediately. He said, "Mother Nature will eat up all the black muck with natural bacteria once there is a normal oxygen level and good tidal flow. This applies to the canal as well.
 
 
Dickinson Bayou and the shoreline can be fixed. It can be a vibrant, aquatic productive estuary once again. Dolphins, alligators, and all manner of wildlife once lived there. The reason our bayou has died is because someone didn't do what they said they were going to do, what they were in fact obligated to do legally.
 
 
Who is responsible for this major screw-up? I believe it is a combination of HL&P not doing the dredging they agreed to do, and the Army Corps of Engineers not verifying that work was performed. It all has to do with money. We have put all of the documentation on our web site. To see the flounder kill video and copies of the permits and the drawings of the proposed dredging that was never done please visit ; www.SeabreezeNews.com/bayou
 
 
You do not need to be a subscriber to see this information.
 
 
A special thanks to Terry Singeltary of Bacliff for all of his help and support. Also, thanks to Texas A&M Galveston Marine Biology Department for their input. We are not finished with our investigation. Look for continued coverage in the next issue of the Seabreeze News. We will be in contact with the Galveston Bay Foundation and their attorney, seeking their knowledge and expertise.
 
 
We hope to find some way to open up Dickinson Bayou and both sides of the HL&P canal in order to facilitate the healing and restoration of our bayou and shorelines, as was expressly promised in the contract.
 
 
I have never been a ''tree hugger", but we cannot stand by and allow our coastal waters to be destroyed in the name of the almighty dollar, especially when the solution to the main problem is so simple. If you have any information to share or "comments please write us at the Seabreeze News or send an email to: steve@Seabreezenews.com. Steve Hoyland Sr. www.SeabreezeNews.com Spillway inlet outlet canal Permit 5972 Hwy 146 Bacliff Texas pdf file HL&P HP ROBINSON Spillway inlet outlet canal Permit 5972 Hwy 146 Bacliff Texas pdf file
 
 
Department of the Army December 9, 1963
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
August 6, 2010 Got Flounder? Not in San Leon.
 
During the month of July, flounder and stingray have been floating up dead all along the San Leon/Bacliff shoreline on the north side. Our freelance reporter, Terry Singeltary, ob- served dead flounder floating by in groups of twos and three's with an occasional five or six. These are big, mature flounder, from two to seven pounds. Along with these flounder, dead stingrays have been seen floating by. Mr. Bobby Redfield, who lives on Bayshore Drive, also observed the same thing and gave me a call. This went on for several days. We received eight more calls where someone people left messages regarding dead flounder floating around the spillway, but did not leave their names and numbers. Our reporter contacted Lance Robinson, the Texas Parks and Wildlife Biologist located at the Dickinson office and expressed his concern about the destruction of these fish. Mr. Robinson said that they were aware of this problem and knew the cause. It turns out that a water treatment plant in the Bacliff area has a discharge pipeline that dumps into the HL&P outlet canal and goes out by way of the spillway and follows the tide. Since there is no longer any pressured flow discharging from HL&P, the chemicals from this treated water build up, removing all of the oxygen from the bottom of the water along the shoreline. The fish that live on the bottom of the bay, like flounder and stingray, cannot survive. This has been going on for years and has not been addressed. With the three sewer plants dumping into Dickinson Bayou and the de- pletion of flounder it makes you wonder why anyone in their right mind would want to put another sewer plant dumping into our precious, fragile resources. Mr. Robinson said they were having a meeting on this very subject. The meeting was to take place one week ago from this newspaper printing. Our reporter has put a call in to Mr. Robinson three days prior to this publication and at this time has not been called back. Maybe the Texas Parks and Wildlife has to contact the CCA and ask them how they should handle it. As we know more, you will know more. Do you fisherman ever wonder why there may be a shortage of flounder? With all of the sewer plants up and down the Texas coast dumping water treatment chemicals into our bays, creeks, rivers, bayous, estuaries, it's no wonder that the flounder are disappearing. What are you going to do about it Texas Parks & Wildlife? Are you going to keep cutting back the limits with the fisherman until you stop fishing for flounder forever, or are you actually going to address the problem? It's time for you Texas fishermen to wake up and let your voices be heard.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
kind regards, terry
 
 
Terry S. Singeltary Sr.
P.O. Box 42
Bacliff, Texas USA 77518


 

 UPDATE AUGUST 31, 2013

August 31, 2013


Dear Steve and Seabreeze et al,

Further to my comments on the NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENT AND NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING FOR AN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TO ADDRESS BACTERIA IN DICKINSON BAYOU AND THREE TIDAL TRIBUTARIES (see those comments below), I still say you can’t continue to pee in your own bathtub (Dickinson Bayou), and never pull the plug, because eventually, you are going to be sitting in a cesspool, which is where we are today. The Implementation Plan, or the (I-Plan), that describes the strategy and activities watershed stakeholders and that of the TCEQ, which they will carry out to improve water quality in Dickinson Bayou and three of its tidal tributaries, all sounds good, but yet out of all the strategies put forth, the most important thing to be done was omitted from the plan. IF as stipulated in your plan, all those that discharge their waste by-products into Dickinson Bayou, i.e. domestic wastewater treatment facilities, sanitary sewer overflows, industrial facilities, a municipal solid waste facility, and regulated storm water dischargers, and the potential un-regulated bacteria sources identified in the TMDL include livestock, wildlife, exotic animals, domestic pets, and malfunctioning on-site sewage, facilities, etc., and remember, all this doggy poop and livestock poop that goes into the ‘Dickinson Bayou Bathtub’, is ‘untreated’, and not to forget the new wastewater treatment facilities that the builders want to cram onto Dickinson Bayou, but out of all your contingency plans put for in your I-Plan, all 7 of your Management Measures (Voluntary Activities), and or of your 4 suggested Control Action (Regulatory Activities), NO WHERE in your plans, did I see the most important factor of alleviating the problems in Dickinson Bayou (the bathtub), NO WHERE did I see where anyone is yet to pull the plug. you can do all of what you have put forth in your plans, but nothing will work in my opinion, until the mouth of Dickinson Bayou is dredged out all the way to the ship channel. anything else will be futile. you can ignore it all you want. you can waste years of implementing plan after plan, keep flushing those toilets, and keep letting everything under the sun poop, and or industrial flush in that bathtub we call Dickinson Bayou, build, build, and build some more, and continue to ignore the most important factor, and Dickinson Bayou will continue to die. You have to flush the toilet, and HL&P, and the Army Corp of Engineers, in my opinion, are responsible for this. This all stipulated in my submission to the TCEQ below. But I will go one step further, in my opinion, to let one more industry, and or one more housing addition be allowed to discharge into Dickinson Bayou, they too should be responsible for a continued maintained DREDGE OF DICKINSON BAYOU, ALL THE WAY TO THE SHIP CHANNEL, NOT PART OF THE WAY, ALL THE WAY, because part of the way will just discharge the bathtub along to the surrounding shorelines. you must flush the bathtub to the ship channel.

IF YOU READ ON PAGE 117-118 OF THIS VERY DOCUMENT, YOU WILL SEE WHERE IN MY OPINION, THE TCEQ AND OR THE ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS FAILED US TERRIBLY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THEIR OWN POLICY.

THIS IS WHAT THEY SHOULD HAVE DONE WITH THE HL&P HP ROBINSON DISCHARGE INLETS AND OUTLETS AND THE MOUTH OF DICKINSON BAYOU, ALL THE WAY TO THE SHIP CHANNEL, ALL ALONG, PLEASE READ ;


page 117 ;


Texas Commission on Environmental Quality is responsible for regulating the discharge of contaminants to surface water, groundwater, soil, and air through a wide variety of programs, and conducts public outreach and education in support of these programs.

The TCEQ also conducts monitoring and assessment of surface waters to determine compliance with water quality standards.

*** TCEQ conducts Section 401 certification reviews of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Section 404 permit applications for the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S., including wetlands. These certification reviews determine whether a proposed discharge will comply with state water quality standards. TCEQ also admin-administers the SEPP, an innovative approach to resolving enforcement actions and improving environmental quality. SEPs are comprised of a wide variety of activities including wetland protection and restoration. TCEQ hosts the Galveston Bay Estuary Program and also provides extensive outreach materials. www.tceq.texas.gov/index.html.

Implementation Plan for Eight TMDLs for Dickinson Bayou and Three Tidal Tributaries Texas Commission on Environmental Quality 109 For Public Comment, September 2013

http://www.tceq.texas.gov/assets/public/waterquality/tmdl/80dickinsonbac/80-DickinsonBacteriaI-PlanComment.pdf



WHY DID TCEQ AND OR ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS FAIL TO ENFORCE THE PERMIT BELOW, TO MAINTAIN A CONSTANT DREDGE FOR THE MOUTH OF THE DICKINSON BAYOU, UP TO AND FROM THE DICKINSON BAYOU HL&P HP ROBINSON PLANT INLET, OUT TO THE SHIP CHANNEL, AS WAS STIPULATED IN THE PERMIT?


see maps of the DREDGE that should have took place long ago from the FOIA documents in the files below...


 Department of the Army December 9, 1963


 https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B1eF4xXstSVGUkllWVpOLWZjZTA/edit



 www.SeabreezeNews.com/bayou



Terry S. Singeltary Sr.
P.O. Box 42
Bacliff, Texas USA 77518
flounder9@verizon.net




From: Roger Miranda
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 4:28 PM
To: Terry S. Singeltary Sr.
Cc: mailto:cyork@tamu.edu ; Linda Broach
Subject: RE: NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENT AND NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING FOR AN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TO ADDRESS BACTERIA IN DICKINSON BAYOU AND THREE TIDAL TRIBUTARIES

 Dear Mr. Singeltary,

We have received your comment. It will be accepted as part of public comment on the Dickinson Bayou and Tidal Tributaries Bacteria TMDL I-Plan and you will receive a response from the TCEQ after the end of the Public Comment Period.

Also, please feel free to contact me anytime.

Sincerely,

Roger Miranda, P.G. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality MC203 P.O. BOX 13087 Austin, Texas 78711-3087 (512) 239-6278 (voice) (512) 239-1414 (fax) Roger.Miranda@tceq.texas.gov






NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENT AND NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING FOR AN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TO ADDRESS BACTERIA IN DICKINSON BAYOU AND THREE TIDAL TRIBUTARIES


Singeltary Comment ;


The TCEQ efforts to bring back quality water, instead of polluted water to the Dickinson Bayou and it’s Tributaries, are greatly appreciated. However, I think it all will be futile, IF the Dickinson Bayou is not dredged out to where the water can flow freely with the tidal movements.

We all know that Dickinson Bayou is and has been blocked up for some time. Dickinson Bayou is like peeing in your own bathtub. eventually, you have to pull the plug. the water has been bad for some time due to not much tidal movement in and out of the spillway inlet and outlet. Via the FOIA, I received the HL&P construction permits back in the 60’s, and the dredging that the Army Corp of engineers said would come, and be maintained constantly, never happened. This constant maintaining of a dredge was to be done all the way to the ship channel, to prevent just what has happened, and it says so in the permit. In my opinion, all the precautions put forth in this plan, will be futile and for nothing, IF this dredge is not finally done, and I mean properly, all the way to the ship channel, as was stipulated in the permit, and maintained. just look at the problems in the past we have had with flounder fish kills along the Bacliff and San Leon Shore Lines, and fish kills inside of Dickinson Bayou. something is wrong, something has been wrong for years, and I believe that due to Dickinson Bayou not being dredged and maintained properly, to allow for a maximum flow, by HL&P is/was a cause to a great many of our problems in Dickinson Bayou, and surrounding waters. I also believe that HL&P should foot the total bill for this, or the Army Corp of engineers, for not making sure HL&P maintained the dredge over the past 5 decades or so. ...


Thank You,

Kindest Regards,

Terry S. Singeltary Sr. P.O. Box 42 Bacliff, Texas 77518 flounder9@verizon.net



==============================================


Executive Summary

On February 8th, 2012, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) adopted Eight Total Maximum Daily Loads for Indicator Bacteria in Dickinson Bayou and Three Tidal Tributaries (Segments 1103, 1103A, 1103B, 1103C, 1104). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved the total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) on June 6th, 2012. This Implementation Plan (I-Plan) de-scribes the strategy and activities watershed stakeholders and the TCEQ will carry out to improve water quality in Dickinson Bayou and three of its tidal tributaries.

This I-Plan is based on the TMDL report and its subsequent revisions, which are documented in updates to the state’s Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). The TMDL identified potential regulated and unregulated sources of indicator bac-teria. Regulated dischargers in the Dickinson Bayou watershed include domestic wastewater treatment facilities, sanitary sewer overflows, industrial facilities, a municipal solid waste facility, and regulated stormwater dischargers. Potential un-regulated bacteria sources identified in the TMDL include livestock, wildlife, exotic animals, domestic pets, and malfunctioning on-site sewage facilities.

This implementation plan, or I-Plan:

 describes the steps watershed stakeholders and the TCEQ will take to achieve the pollutant reductions necessary to restore and protect water quality,

 identifies the means by which these activities will be implemented,

 outlines the schedule for implementation of these activities, and

 describes how stakeholders and the TCEQ will track implementation of these activities and monitor improvements in water quality.

The ultimate goal of this I-Plan is the reduction of bacteria concentrations in each of the assessment units of Dickinson Bayou Tidal (Segment 1103), Bensons Bayou (1103A), Bordens Gully (1103B), and Geisler Bayou (1103C) and Dickinson Bayou Above Tidal (Segment 1104) to levels that meet the criteria defined in the state wa-ter quality standards to support contact recreation.

In concert with the TCEQ, the stakeholders of the Dickinson Bayou watershed de-veloped seven management measures and four control actions that will be used to reduce bacteria contributions.

Implementation Plan for Eight TMDLs for Dickinson Bayou and Three Tidal Tributaries

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality 2 For Public Comment, September 2013

Management Measures (Voluntary Activities)

1) Improve management of on-site sewage facilities (OSSFs).

2) Improve wastewater treatment facilities (WWTFs).

3) Promote increased participation in existing conservation and cost-share pro-grams.

4) Restore and repair riparian zones.

5) Preserve and restore natural wetlands.

6) Construct treatment wetlands.

7) Provide demonstrations and encourage installation of stormwater best man-agement practices including rain gardens, bioswales, and rain water harvesting.

Control Action (Regulatory Activities)

1) Implement stricter bacteria limits and stricter enforcement measures for WWTF effluents.

2) Increase compliance and enforcement by the TCEQ.

3) Revise penalties and violations for sanitary sewer system (SSSs) and WWTFs.

4) Improve reporting requirements for sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs).

This I-Plan identifies responsible parties, technical and financial needs, monitoring and outreach efforts, and a schedule of activities for each management measure and control action. It describes the process that the TCEQ and stakeholders will use to assess progress and adjust the plan periodically.

The TCEQ will track the progress of this I-Plan in restoring the affected use. Water quality data will be collected for five years to identify trends and compliance with the water quality standards. If standards are not attained by the end of the moni-toring period, the TCEQ and watershed stakeholders should reevaluate the TMDL and the I-Plan and take appropriate action. The TCEQ will report the results of im-plementation tracking and evaluation on its web site, at regional forums and to stakeholders as needed.

Introduction

snip...



http://www.tceq.texas.gov/assets/public/waterquality/tmdl/80dickinsonbac/80-DickinsonBacteriaI-PlanComment.pdf




 

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

Prion TSE in the Ocean aka mad fish disease

if it ain't enough to worry about the PCBs, mercury, arsenic, and the rest of the carcinogen man puts in our oceans and the air we breath, now we have to worry about mad cow disease. I have come to the conclusion, man is NOT the smartest creature on earth, but by far, the most stupid. stupid is, as stupid does, and some times folks, you just can't fix stupid $




Wednesday, July 10, 2013

 

Prions in the Ocean: A Natural Case of Prion Disease in Dolphins

 


 
 
 
 
tss