Thursday, May 14, 2015

Osprey Galveston Bay Bacliff Texas 77518 meet Freedom

Osprey Galveston Bay Bacliff Texas 77518 meet Freedom


 

we call our friend that comes about 6pm regularly 'Freedom' aka 'chum maker'. i made a perch and the end of the pier looks like the floor of a seafood slaughter house, good chum for the end of the pier though. a truly majestic bird...


 

 
 
 


 



 

here is a nice article about Osprey’s ;

 

Osprey "Fishing Perfection"

 

From a hundred feet in the air, the hovering angler folded its wings, silently slipping like lightening from the sky.  Suddenly a four-foot portion of the lake thundered into prisomed plumes of diamondized droplets.  Completely immersed, the feathered predator floated to the surface, struggling to emerge with a fish in its talons.  A third, then fourth, labored wing-beat increased the height from the lake's surface.  In a remarkable finale, the fishing raptor shook off excess water, gliding ever so closely to the pool's shimmering surface again.  While positioning the fish straight ahead, torpedo-style in its talons, the Osprey began stroking upward, its wriggling prey secured.  With most efficient style, this lean, flying machine had spied its quarry and with amazing desire, just took it.  You thought your tackle box contained everything you needed to catch a fish, but this was truly an incredible display of "fishing perfection!"


Ospreys are well equipped for obtaining a meal.  They can see five times more clearly than people, so they easily spot their prey. As bow-hunters realize when spear-fishing, underwater targets are not where they appear, due to water's refraction of sunlight rays.  In flight Ospreys close the nictitating membrane, a thin layer of clear tissue like an inner eyelid, over their eyes to keep the eye moist.  During a dive the membrane protects the eye when Ospreys hit the water.  They are the only raptor with nose flaps that close, so they can go completely under the surface.  Also, Ospreys' pale-bluish toes are tipped with nature's finest fishhooks: talons, sharp as needles.  Toes have roughened protuberances or "spicules" to hold slippery fish, and outside toes are capable of swiveling backward to join the rear toe or "hallux" (two toes clamping with two toes versus the standard three toes and hallux).  This allows grasping fish torpedo style, which reduces wind resistance while in flight.   Ospreys also have the ability to lift from water, vertically, using specialized joints at wing wrists or "carpals".  These anatomical tools distinguish ospreys as unique in the raptor kingdom.  No other birds of prey combine all of these capabilities into one species.


The Osprey’s scientific name (Pandion haliaetus) comes from the mythical king of Athens, Pandion, whose daughters were turned into birds, and by the Greek words halos, referring to the sea, and aetos, or eagle.  Ospreys, commonly called fish hawks or fish eagles, are neither a true hawk nor eagle.  The species is of ancient lineage and is presently classified near the, hawk-like, kite family.  It has a worldwide range and some ornithologists call the Osprey “The Natural Citizen of the World.”  Four subspecies are presently recognized, two of which occur in North America; P.h. carolinensus in temperate North America (including Iowa) and P.h. ridgwayi in the Caribbean.  The common name Osprey is from ossifragus, a Latin word meaning “bone breaker,” referring to the strong grip of its talons.


Osprey fossils, the bones and other remains of ancient animal life, show that Ospreys have been on earth for 13 million years.  An Osprey from the past was smaller, but had a range similar to today’s Ospreys.


People have long admired the Osprey’s fishing skills and strength, incorporating Ospreys into their cultures.  Ancient Greeks thought Ospreys could predict lightning.  Asian emperors had Osprey pictures woven into palace tapestries.  In South America, native people used Osprey feathers and bones in ceremonies to guarantee fishing success.  In Canada, a Northwest Coast First Nation legend tells of a marriage between an Osprey and a whale that created the Orca whale.  An Orca is actually a large and black-and-white dolphin that jumps out of the water like a bird in flight and has a cry that sounds like an Osprey’s.  Osprey calls consist of a series of shrill, staccato whistles, gradually rising in pitch, tewp, tewp, teelee, teelee, tewp.


Ospreys are large narrow-winged, fishing raptors, weighing between 2.5 and 4.5 pounds.  An Osprey’s six-foot wingspan is so large it is sometimes mistaken for an eagle, but an Osprey’s wing is narrower and curves backward at its wrist, like the wing of a gull.  Unlike an eagle’s wing-plane, which is straight, the Osprey needs to rise out of water with a large fish and has a special joint allowing this maneuver.  In contrast to the eagle an Osprey’s forehead is smooth.  Ospreys don’t fly through trees or tall grass to catch their prey, so they don’t need the bony ridge above their eyes that other raptors have for protection.


Ospreys’ field marks are dark carpal, or wrist, patches on the underside of each wing.  The dark spots come in handy when the bird is hunting.  From a distance the dark spots look like two small gulls dipping and soaring rather than one large bird about to strike.   

                                      
An Osprey wears light feathers on the underside of its body and dark feathers on top.  The white feathers on its chest look like the light colors of the sky to its prey - any fish swimming below.  The dark colors camouflage, or hide, the Osprey from its predators, large owls that attack from above, particularly when they’re on the nest.  The brown and white barred, or evenly striped, feathers on the underside of an Osprey’s wings and tail help hide its shape in flight.  To camouflage its head, an Osprey wears dark spots on top, and a dark stripe through its eye area, like wraparound sunglasses.  This eye stripe, called a malar (MAY-ler) stripe, may reduce sun glare, like the black grease used under the eyes of athletes.  An adult Osprey’s eyes are yellow.  Its brown hooked beak, its gray legs and feet, and its black talons don’t reflect sunlight, so there’s no glare to give away its position.  An Osprey’s talons are made of keratin, the same substance as our fingernails.  If part of a talon breaks off it will slowly grow back.


Unlike many raptors, male and female Ospreys are very similar.  A female Osprey is slightly larger, and usually wears a darker necklace, or band of speckles, across her white chest that helps her hide while nesting.

While hunting, Ospreys can spot a fish two hundred feet away.  An Osprey is a strong flyer, flying with a slightly circular motion at about 25 mph. When diving for its prey, an Osprey enters the water at about 40mph and can catch a fish up to three feet underwater.  Studies report a family with two young needs four to five fish per day.  Fish like bullheads and carp forage about the bottom and lakesides.  With their interests directed downward, they become vulnerable for Ospreys from above.  Fish taken are generally in the range of 5 – 12 inches in length.  A fish is usually successfully snagged in one out of three tries.  Ospreys are known to carry fish upwards of five miles to remote nests.
 

     An Osprey bathes often by wading breast-deep into shallow water, putting its heads underwater, and beating its wings.  Excess water is shaken from wings and the bird flies to a sunny perch, where it holds its wings out to dry like laundry hanging on a clothesline.  After feeding, an Osprey may wipe its beak on a branch, or flick away fish scales by shaking its head back and forth.  To clean its feet it flies low over the surface of the water and drags them through the water.  It may also do this to cool itself on a hot day.



Nests may be built at varying heights upon any structure, natural or man-made, that provides a platform.  Ospreys occasionally nest on or near the ground or upon buoys over water.  Nests are usually one foot deep, four to five feet wide, made of sticks and lined with grass.  Apparently, visibility is important in nest-site selection; osprey nests provide a commanding view of surroundings.  They are usually located on prominent landforms, peninsulas or islands with few, or preferably no, tree branches higher than the nest.


Osprey clutches consist of three or four eggs that are creamy white and heavily spotted brown. Eggs are laid at two-to-three-day intervals in late May.   After the first egg is laid, incubation proceeds for 38 days and is dominated by the female.  Both parents have “brood patches” to aid incubating eggs.  Brood patches are featherless areas on raptors’ abdomens where eggs receive warmth for necessary incubation.  The male provides food for the female and brood after hatching.  The female remains in constant attendance the first 30 days, providing protection from predators and the elements.  Predators include raccoons, gulls, crows and owls.  When predators are near, camouflaged nestlings lie outstretched and motionless as a natural defense. 


At 42 days, young can tear apart fish provided by parents and around 53 days, first flight occurs.  Young of the year quickly acquire fishing skills and gradually expand their range until dispersal in late August.  Immature Ospreys spend up to 20 months at their over-wintering areas in Central and South America.  Some Ospreys migrate 4,000 miles from the Northern Hemisphere to the Southern Hemisphere.  Adults attain sexual maturity when three to four years of age.  Researchers estimate first-year bird mortality at 51 - 57% with adult mortality at 16 - 20% annually.  Average life expectancy can be fifteen years.  So an Osprey may migrate over 62,000 miles in a lifetime.  That is about as far as 2 ½ times around the world!


Ospreys were heavily affected by the biocide crash of the 1950s, which was caused by organo-chlorines like DDT.  Organo-chlorines caused eggshell thinning which led to fewer and fewer young to replenish the population.  Numbers were severely reduced throughout their range, but were hardest hit in Great Lakes and Atlantic coast areas.  Osprey populations have shown a gradual increase since DDT and similar substances were banned in the United States in 1972.  By 1981, 8,000 osprey pairs existed in the continental 48 states, and by 1994 a national survey tallied 14,109 pairs.


According to tribal elders of the Omaha nation, accounts of Ospreys nesting along Iowa waterways are included in their oral traditional stories.  These indigenous people have lived throughout northwestern Iowa for thousands of years.  However, no successful Osprey nesting had been documented in Iowa since European settlement.  A report in 1892 indicated a nesting might have occurred along the Cedar River, but the addled Osprey egg was not recognized by the Iowa Ornithologists' Union of that time as positive proof of nesting.  In the year 2000, an osprey nesting attempt occurred in northwestern Iowa.  It was believed the pair was the result of Ospreys released by Minnesota DNR in mid 1990s at Heron Lake in southwestern Minnesota, approximately 25 miles north of the nest.  No eggs were laid but this pair held a promise for future nesting successes. (This was the pair that successfully nested at Spirit Lake Middle School outdoor classroom in 2003.)


Male Ospreys show strong fidelity to ancestral breeding areas, preferring to nest colonially where adults originated.  Female ospreys may disperse hundreds of miles from their origin, however males will generally return within about 20 miles of origin.  Due to this very low dispersal tendency by males, young Ospreys are prime candidates for relocation.  Projects are designed to spread young of the population, geographically, to areas where ospreys do not nest.  This strategy will ultimately improve nestling survival and complete continental population distribution.


With construction of lakes and reservoirs by Department of Natural Resources, County conservation boards, private industry, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, potential Osprey habitat exists today that was previously not available.  Historically, there were numerous Osprey summer sightings in Iowa, but apparently these young, non-breeding Ospreys returned to areas where they were reared for mating and nesting.  During the last 20 years, the number of migrants through Iowa has increased as breeding populations to the north have grown.  Despite this population growth, Ospreys have demonstrated little breeding range expansion.  Minnesota and Wisconsin DNR officials suggested that Ospreys, in our lifetime, do not readily pioneer new breeding ranges.  Instead, they experience suppressed reproduction as density of nesting pairs increase.  Scientists have determined that a raptor population is in jeopardy of crashing, when the average fledging success of young per nest approaches 0.8 chicks/nest.  To address this issue, young Ospreys from Wisconsin and Minnesota began being relocated to areas with suitable habitat in southern Minnesota, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri and Ohio. Wildlife populations evenly distributed across suitable habitat will be able to withstand pockets with high contaminants that stress those populations. As biological indicator species, raptors reflect the health of our environment.  Contaminants like DDT negatively impact or destroy raptor populations and will ultimately affect humans negatively.


Dr. Larry Rymon, noted Pennsylvania ornithologist who initiated Osprey relocations along the eastern seaboard, observes that 45% of the continental Osprey population nest upon manmade structures.  Therefore nesting platforms have been placed near all release sites in anticipation of returning Osprey usage.  Mr. Bill Fraundorf  from ALLETE Energy of Minnesota and Mr. Mark Martell of Minnesota Audubon and Ms. Pat Manthey and Mr. Lowell Tesky of Wisconsin DNR, assisted by The Raptor Center of St. Paul, have provided Ospreys for Iowa releases.


Young Ospreys' availability for potential relocation is evaluated in early July.  Approximately 42-day-old Ospreys from Minnesota and Wisconsin are located in nests where more than one young exists.  Within hours, The Raptor Center staff members in St. Paul examine the Ospreys for relocation suitability.  When approved, birds are driven to release sites and placed in carefully constructed release towers or "hack sites."  Hack sites are predator proof 8' x 8' x 8' structures with bars on the front that provide visibility of surroundings.  The bars are opened when ospreys are released. Trained volunteers feed the young daily in such a manner that the birds do not imprint on people.  By quietly viewing ospreys through one-way mirrored glass or from monitors, detailed observations of each bird's temperament and condition are logged daily.   

When Ospreys are approximately 53 days of age, they are full-grown with rapidly developing feathers and are ready to be released.  The birds are actually heavier than they will be as adults, due to built-in fat reserves until self-sufficiency is achieved.  Great care is exercised to ensure that young are not startled into their first flight - at this stage of the young Ospreys’ development, the less disturbance or drama, the better.  Once Ospreys have flown, volunteer spotters monitor the birds' movements the best they can, either from shore or in boats for the first few days.  It has been shown that young Ospreys can fly better, the first time out, than they can land upon a perch.  As with other raptors, returning to a perch near the hack box can become a fatal learning experience for young flyers.  After the Ospreys fledge, volunteers supplement the birds’ diets with fish at the hack site, until birds begin fishing on their own and self-sufficiency is achieved.



These combined activities by volunteers provide tremendous opportunities for outdoor-loving families to connect with a most dynamic raptor.  These duties have become great opportunities to establish touchstones with our environment and influence our need to be good stewards of our land and waters.  Efforts by these volunteers are moving this project forward.  There is empowerment volunteers can build upon in other wildlife and habitat enhancement projects.


The Iowa Department of Natural Resources has assisted conservation partners with technical assistance and providing proper permits to bring Ospreys to Iowa.  Encouragement and fish to successfully release Ospreys in Iowa have also been included.  Ms. Jodeane Cancilla of the Macbride Raptor Project located near Coralville Reservoir spearheaded this work.  Beginning in 1997, four or five young ospreys were released annually at their facility from 1997 until 2002.  Since that time, Hartman Reserve Nature Center staff in Cedar Falls released Ospreys at their facility from 1998 - 2005.  In succession County Conservation Boards and volunteer groups have placed Ospreys at Jester Park in Polk Co. from 2000 - 2004, Don Williams Lake in Boone Co. from 2003 - 2006, Clear Lake in Cerro Gordo Co. from 2004 - 2008, Wickiup Hill in Linn Co. from 2004 - 2007, Red Rock Reservoir in Marion Co. from 2005 - 2008, White Rock Conservancy by S.O.A.R. from 2006, Spirit Lake in Dickinson Co. from 2007, Mud Lake in Dubuque Co. from 2008, and Annett Nature Center in Warren Co. from 2009.  The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has provided distinguished service for releases at Coralville and Saylorville Reservoir respectively.  Assisted by literally hundreds of volunteers, these conservation organizations have devoted their efforts to bring Ospreys to Iowa as a nesting species.  Project fundraising is the responsibility of the conservation organizations doing the releases.  Ospreys cost about $525 per bird.  In Iowa, Ospreys have two bands, a silver U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service band and a numbered, lavender band on separate legs.  Wild produced Ospreys from Iowa receive a green USFWS band on their left leg. In 2010 a green banded, F2 generation Osprey fledged three young at Polk City Refuge in Polk County.  Also, in 2010 natural reproduction around the state was 21 Ospreys at fourteen successful sites which equaled the number of birds relocated to Iowa at 21 Ospreys.


We can think of Ospreys as "sentinels of clean water."   Ospreys rely upon fish for food and fish need clean water.  Ospreys also need to be able to see fish in our water, so turbidity and siltation become critical issues.  Fish need clean water, ospreys need clean water; we all need clean water.  But clean water doesn't just happen.  It requires standards of decency that can benefit everyone and everything.  Joining Bald Eagles, Trumpeter Swans, Sand-hill Cranes, wetland mammals and our myriad of waterfowl, Ospreys can be appreciated in all water quality endeavors and provide a rewarding environmental connection for all Iowans.  Moreover, as a highly desirable watchable wildlife species, it's great to see "fishing perfection" in Iowa.


For more information contact:  the Wildlife Diversity Program, 1436 255th St., Boone, IA  50036.As the osprey flew from sight, we felt privileged to
part the placid pool with our paddles and proceeded onward.


Story by Pat Schlarbaum and photos courtesy of Bill Schuerman
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Sunday, April 5, 2015

Proposed Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area or Rice Dike Post Hurricane Land Grab in Disguise or Has There Been a Ike Dike Game Change Plan ?

Proposed Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area or Rice Dike Post Hurricane Land Grab in Disguise or Has There Been a Ike Dike Game Change Plan ?

 

 

Greetings County Officials, Professor Merrell et al TAMU, Family, Friends, Neighbors et al,

 

 

In regards to ;

 

 

Galveston County

 

League City City Council

 

by Garrett Bryce and Jim Guidry with photos courtesy League City TV Wednesday, March 25, 2015

 

League City City Council on Tuesday voted unanimously to deny a resolution supporting the creation of the Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area.

 

Several people spoke in opposition to the proposal. “They proclaim that preserving our wetlands will slow down and reduce repetitive losses associated with storm surges; at the same time they want to achieve a national recreation area status,” Kim Kitchen said, adding that the coastal spine proposed by Dr. William Merrell would provide better protection. “I don’t know about you, but unless there is a 200-foot rogue wave, I’ll take my chances with the Ike Dike, because I have more faith in Mother Nature than I do with the government and their organizations.” Listen (2:39)

 

The resolution, if approved, would have allowed the city to become a member of the partnership formed to implement the proposed recreational area, which includes portions of Matagorda, Brazoria, Chambers and Galveston counties.

 

*** The resolution also stated that the city would agree to "allow some or all of the properties that they own within the boundaries of the proposed Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area to be considered for use to achieve the recreation, conservation, and flood mitigation goals" of the proposed area.

 

 


 

 

IF this is not a ‘red herring’ of sorts, and you all made this choice unanimously on the merits alone i.e. IKE DIKE VS RICE DIKE, and that the League City Council is 100% for the Ike Dike, then I think the League City Council made the right decision on this one.

 

THANK YOU !

 

NICE JOB !

 

What is the Proposed Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area or Rice Dike ?

 

Proposed Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area or Rice Dike Post Hurricane Land Grab in Disguise?

 

How can more Tourism, stop a 20 or 25+ foot tidal surge?

 

Proposed Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area A Concept for the Upper Texas Coast

 

Proposed Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area

 

 The Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area: Economic Prosperity, Recreation and Flood Mitigation Based on Natural Assets

 

The Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area (LSCNRA) is a creative idea to realize the economic potential of the fabulous natural and historic resources of the upper Texas Coast. The LSCNRA, conceived as part of an integrated, long-term flood mitigation system, focuses on the low-lying tidal and brackish marshlands and the surrounding upland areas. The concept emerged from work funded by The Houston Endowment and conducted by the SSPEED Center at Rice University in association with the Green Think Tank of Houston Wilderness. While providing flood protection benefits, the LSCNRA would also help realize the significant potential economic value these lands have for geotourism--bird-watching, kayaking, history trails, and hiking, and more traditional uses such as fishing and hunting. The LSCNRA is compatible with, and even complimentary to, structural surge flood solutions.

 

What is a National Recreation Area?

 

National Recreation Areas are designated by Congress as land and water with outdoor recreation potential of national significance. Most emphasize water-based recreation and range in size, contiguity, land ownership structure, governing institutions and functional purposes. Some are stand-alone units, while others comprise a cluster of noncontiguous lands and structures. Recognition as a National Recreation Area would place the upper Texas coast alongside the Boston Harbor and the Golden Gate National Recreation Areas as nationally acclaimed tourism and recreation destinations.

 

What does the upper Texas Coast have to offer?

 

The upper Texas coastal region has the benefit of being highly accessible with recreational opportunities of this area as impressive as they are varied. These opportunities include:

 

•World-class bird-watching on Mad Island, High Island and Bolivar Flats along with the East End Lagoon, San Luis Pass on Galveston Island, the rookeries of Drum Bay and coastal and forested habitats of the Brazos, Colorado and San Bernard river areas.

 

•Fishing and crabbing in Galveston Bay and Matagorda Bay.

 

•Seasonal hunting within the wildlife refuges and management areas and on private property.

 

•Kayaking on the backside of the Bolivar Peninsula, the marsh lakes of the mainland of Chambers, Galveston, Matagorda and Brazoria Counties and the oyster reefs and sea grass flats of Christmas Bay.

 

•Bicycle trails in Galveston and Surfside.

 

•Cultural, architectural, military and maritime historical landmarks of both Texas and the United States.

 

What are the benefits of National Recreation Area Designation?

 

•A National Recreation Area designation would serve to drive economic development by packaging and promoting year-around tourism and outdoor recreation, while protecting the ecological services that support the region’s bountiful estuaries and rookeries, and the low-lying lands that help to mitigate storm surge during large hurricanes. By its 10th year of operation, the Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area is estimated to:

 

•Attract 1.5 million visitors and support $192 million in local sales, more than 4 times the current level;

 

•Sustain 11% more jobs in the regional tourism industry.

 

•At seven similar national sites similar to the proposed LSCNRA, visitation grew an average of 565% in the first ten years of operation.

 

National Recreation Area Partnership Structure

 

The LSCNRA is proposed as a partnership in which local, state, and federal governments along with non-governmental organizations and private property owners voluntarily choose to participate. The partnership blends local priorities with National Park Service opportunities.

 

•A charter for the LSCNRA, developed by those interested in participating, would be tailored to local preferences, needs and circumstances.

 

•Landowners within the area could elect to participate, depending upon their needs and desires. All decisions to participate would be voluntary.

 

•If individual landowners choose not to opt in to the LSCNRA, they would not be subject to guidelines or management criteria that might be adopted under the charter now or in the future.

 

•The Park Service brings funding and staffing to the table, contributing its expertise in areas such as education, science, visitor services, and planning.

 

•A general management plan developed by the partnership guides national recreation area operation and helps coordinate participating agency activities. The general management plan does not override partners’ decision-making authorities.

 

More Resources for Lone Star Coastal Recreation Area

 


 

 

OPPORTUNITY KNOCKS, instead of the IKE DIKE $$$

 

OPPORTUNITY KNOCKS

 

Star Coastal Nation Recreation Area Could Attract Visitors, Boost Business, and Create Jobs

 


 

 

The Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area

 

By Jim Blackburn, SSPEED Center, Rice University Presented to CLE International, February, 2013 Updated July 2013

 

Severe Storm Prediction, Education and Evacuation from Disaster (SSPEED) Center at Rice University to study “Lessons Learned From Hurricane Ike”.

 

 In light of these precepts and our understanding of the potential for economic damage to the Houston economy, and therefore the region, and ecological damage to Galveston Bay, six areas have emerged from our research that are worthy of special attention for surge impact mitigation.

 

=========================================================

PLEASE TAKE NOTE...TSS

=========================================================

 

(1) We have concluded the Houston Ship Channel needs to be protected from storm surge and that a gate structure could be constructed in the vicinity of the State Highway 146 Hartman Bridge that crosses the Houston Ship Channel near its outlet to Galveston Bay. We believe that this alternative could be funded by local bond funds at a cost in the vicinity of $1 billion and would provide more than $100 billion in economic benefits as well as saving the ecology of Galveston Bay from

 

3

 

hazardous materials and oil released by a surge from tanks in the refineries and chemical plants that line 20+ miles of the Houston Ship Channel.

 

==========================================================

PLEASE TAKE NOTE...TSS

==========================================================

 

(2) We have determined that the Clear Lake area is extremely vulnerable, and that a structural alternative to protect this area is unlikely in the short term. Information is the key in this area that is extremely vulnerable to surge flooding. All new home buyers should be told about the vulnerability of their home to storm surges. We are working on a hurricane/flood warning, evacuation and re‐entry system for this area. And we urge that a fund be set aside to be used in the event of serious surge flooding to buy out those who have lost everything.

 

==========================================================

PLEASE TAKE NOTE...TSS

==========================================================

 

(3) We have determined that most of the flooding of the City of Galveston came from the “backside” of the island and that a levee system could be constructed that would connect the existing seawall around the city itself. This solution would leave the West End of Galveston Island unprotected. We have concluded that a structural solution to protect the West End is not feasible unless it provides much larger economic benefits than will be generated by protecting the West End development.

 

(4) We believe that the existing levee systems of Texas City and Freeport have served us well in the past and should be upgraded and maintained. During Ike, storm waters reached the top of the Texas City levee. Both the Texas City and Freeport levees need to be increased in height and in some cases in the area protected.

 

(5) We have proposed that a non‐structural surge mitigation concept called the Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area (LSCNRA) be developed for the low‐lying, generally undeveloped areas of Chambers, Galveston, Brazoria and Matagorda Counties. The basic idea is to focus on development and enhancement of economic development that is flood resilient. The remainder of this paper is focused on the LSCNRA.

 

(6) We have also proposed another non‐structural, economically focused alternative called the Ecosystem Services Exchange. This alternative is distinct from the LSCNRA and involves creating a supplemental farm and ranch economy associated with restoring the ecosystem service value of natural coastal ecosystems and allowing for the buying and selling of these services. That alternative will be the subject of a subsequent paper.

 


 

the ‘non‐structural surge mitigation concept called the Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area (LSCNRA)’, might bring greater tourism and more money to the area economy, but it will not stop a 25+ foot storm surge, or a 20 foot storm surge as far as that goes.

 

what Jim Blackburn has done by endorsing the Rice Dike or the Proposed Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area, has taken everyone’s property along the Galveston Bay Coast, and all it’s fishing villages, all it’s homesteads, and all the folks there from, and made them collateral damage in favor of Tourism and or Big Petro Chemical, and the cost and protection there from will be on the backs of every one that lives in these areas. this is sad in my opinion.

 

if that’s the case, make the big petro chemicals and or tourism industry pay for it, not a dime off the backs they will profit from, the coastal community’s.  

 

seems this Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area (LSCNRA) is the RICE DIKE in disguise. it’s a clone of the Rice Dike in my opinion.

 

it’s time to start building the Ike Dike. the sooner the better. if we can still put folks on the moon (I know we did before), pay to go to Mars, maybe via the moon, give our money away to every Country that puts a hand out, why in the hell can’t we build a big gate to protect everyone in Galveston Bay, instead of those just on the North end, north to Houston, vie gate under Fred Hartman Bridge? it does not compute.

 

if Holland can do it, why can’t the USA?

 


 

 

enough debate. enough studies. enough talk. build the IKE DIKE, not a tourist attraction, and especially not from taking our land. you have already drawn us off the map. well we’re still here damn’t.

 

 

*** Furthermore, this proposal leaves waterfront properties and communities east of SH- 146 vulnerable; however, it maintains the possibility of waterfront recreation and other environmental and natural coastal features.




 



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 

 

I stated before ;

 

‘’The Rice Dike is not about saving our communities from another Hurricane Ike, the Rice Dike is a LAND GRAB.’’

 

and apparently, that’s all the Proposed Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area is, maybe a watered down version, and a name change.

 

Call your City, County and state government officials and representatives and tell them NO to the Rice dike, and the Proposed Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area, and YES to the Ike Dike. we can’t wait any longer.   

 

 

*** Furthermore, this proposal leaves waterfront properties and communities east of SH- 146 vulnerable;

 

*** however, it maintains the possibility of waterfront recreation and other environmental and natural coastal features.

 

 

RICE UNIVERSITY IKE DIKE hwy-146-levee proposal, THAT WOULD WASH AWAY SEABROOK, KEMAH, BAYVIEW, BACLIFF, AND SAN LEON

 

NOVEMBER 2011

 

Preliminary research results indicate that the most feasible structure will be a levee along SH-146 accompanied by pocket levees, built by private landowners. The levee would connect natural 25 foot elevations near the Houston Ship Channel and the Texas City Dike effectively protecting the properties and critical facilities and infrastructure west of SH-146. However, moveable barriers would need to be placed at Clear Lake and highway underpasses.

 

*** Furthermore, this proposal leaves waterfront properties and communities east of SH- 146 vulnerable; however, it maintains the possibility of waterfront recreation and other environmental and natural coastal features.

 


 

 

*** HERE is a IKE DIKE proposal that would help SAVE AND PROTECT SHOREACRES, La Porte, SEABROOK, KEMAH, BAYVIEW, BACLIFF, AND SAN LEON.

 

*** THIS Ike Dike proposal by TAMU does NOT abandon all of us that have lived here all our lives, and this proposal does not sell out to developers ;

 


 

 

Thursday, November 27, 2014

 

IKE DIKE VS RICE DIKE PUBLIC INPUT SOUGHT PLEASE WRITE IN SUPPORT OF TAMU IKE DIKE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 


 

 

 

URGENT !

 

 

************UPDATE IKE DIKE SPECIAL INTEREST GAME CHANGE*****************

 

 

HOWEVER, in December 2014, seems the concept of the IKE dike vs the SSPEED Rice Dike converged, we had a GAME PLAN CHANGE, and in my opinion, it’s not good, seems big business and special interest won out, and coastal communities inside of Galveston Bay, well, they are all just going to be collateral damage $$$

 

 

************UPDATE IKE DIKE SPECIAL INTEREST GAME CHANGE*****************

 

 

Working document, not to be referenced.

 

GAME PLAN: Framework for Flood Risk Reduction in the Galveston Bay Area

 

VERSION 1 – December 5, 2014

 

Main report written and edited by: S.N. (Bas) Jonkman (TU Delft), Mathijs van Ledden (RHDHV & TU Delft) Kasper Lendering (TU Delft), Leslie Mooyaart (RHDHV & TU Delft), Bill Merrell (Texas A&M Galveston), Arno Willems (Iv Infra).

 

With contributions from: Samuel Brody (Texas A&M Galveston), Kayode Atoba (Texas A&M Galveston), Wes Highfield (Texas A&M Galveston), Russell Blessing (Texas A&M Galveston), Jens Figlus (Texas A&M Galveston), Galen Newman (Texas A&M Galveston), Eric Bardenhagen (Texas A&M Galveston), Bruce Ebersole (Jackson State University), Tom Richardson (Jackson State University), Antonia Sebastian (Rice University), Robert Gilmer (Bauer College of Business, Univ. of Houston) and Adam Perdue (Bauer College of Business, Univ. of Houston).

 

GAME PLAN Flood Risk Reduction for the Galveston Bay area

 

snip...

 

Game plan - SSPEED Center statement

 

Another recent development in Galveston Bay surge suppression research is an agreement between the SSPEED Center at Rice University and Texas A&M University at Galveston to work more closely together. So far, the two research groups have agreed to the following statement.

 

“The SSPEED Center at Rice University and Texas A&M University at Galveston have been studying strategies for surge suppression for the Galveston Bay Region. SSPEED had been concentrating its efforts on suppressing surge using barriers internal to the Bay system and non-structural alternatives, while Texas A&M Galveston has concentrated on methods to stop the surge at the coast using a continuous coastal barrier – the “Ike Dike” concept. Both Texas A&M Galveston and the SSPEED Center will continue their research efforts, while collaborating with each other, with an eye towards ultimately combining their various strategies to achieve the best overall solution for the region from an economic, environmental and social perspective.

 

GAME PLAN Flood Risk Reduction for the Galveston Bay area

 

6

 

The SSPEED Center and Texas A&M University at Galveston will coordinate their modelling work and analyses so that the knowledge gained by all efforts can be shared and utilized to more efficiently and effectively reach the development of a regional surge defence strategy for the entire Houston-Galveston area. Each institution is committed to finding the best overall solution for the entirety of Galveston Bay and will work together to achieve that result.“

 

As the two groups work together, more synergies and common interests will appear. It is in everyone’s interest to see that the very best academic research and thinking is fully included in the actionable plans developed for suppressing surge in the Galveston Bay region. As one step in this process, SSPEED researchers have been invited to participate in the December 14-17, 2014 meeting of Ike dike researchers.

 


 

 

common special interest, is what they meant $$$...terry

 

 

see how high the tide still was, a day or two after IKE, looking right into our garage and garage apartment, look how high the tide still is, WITHOUT THE RICE SPPEED DAM...dike.

 


 

 

see a shot of our garage and apartment out back of our house and our land from the neighbors video next door (*see how high tide still is several days after Ike*). we need Ike Dike. tourist and money are NOT going to stop a 25+ foot storm surge, when the next big one comes up the ship channel. also, consider Bacliff. this area was the highest around the Bay, back when it was 18+ feet when I was a child. now we are sitting around 14 feet.

 


 

 

 

see some old history on IKE vs RICE SPPEED Dike ;

 

 

=====================

 

 

From: Terry S. Singeltary Sr.

 

Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 5:30 PM

 

To: William Merrell

 

Cc: Cherie Coffman

 

Subject: Re: Ike Dike question ?

 

fantastic! thank you for your kind reply Sir, and explanation for the layperson such as me. many thanks, I like your proposal much, much, better Sir, considering my backyard is Galveston Bay here in Bacliff, 77518 shoreline. with that rice university plan, the shorelines from Kemah to San Leon and property values there from would tank and the next big one, we would all be marsh land. course, it would not matter much anyway, because that big toxic dredge island I have to look at everyday now, you know the one they propose to double in size now, well all that would be in our houses. ...what were they thinking. ...thanks again. with kindest regards, terry

 

 

=====================

 

 

From: William Merrell

 

Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 5:08 PM

 

To: Terry S. Singeltary Sr.

 

Cc: Cherie Coffman

 

Subject: RE: Ike Dike question ?

 

 

Again - the Dike you describe is proposed by Rice University. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the Ike Dike. The Ike Dike protects everyone in the Bay because it is along the coast. You can verify this and learn the details of the Ike Dike by going to our website

 

 


 

 

=====================

 

 

From: Terry S. Singeltary Sr. [mailto:flounder9@verizon.net]

 

Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 5:00 PM

 

To: William Merrell

 

Cc: Cherie Coffman

 

Subject: Re: Ike Dike question ?

 

Greetings again Dr. Merrell,

 

Sir, I had a question.

 

I did not have any ideas, other than the fact, I am concerned and confused on one of rumored proposals of Ike Dike, and we wanted to know the truth, and I was told, you were the person to go to, and my question was as follows ;

 

i heard that one of the potential designs for the ike dike, would have everyone living south of the Kemah bridge on hwy 146, and everyone east of hwy 146 there from, i.e. Kemah, Bayview, Bacliff, and San Leon, all these fishing communities would be EAST OF SAID IKE DIKE, as the said IKE DIKE would be built west of hwy 146, thus leaving everyone east of 146 to be left for marsh land, as any hurricane after said IKE DIKE built would leave these fishing communities as marsh lands due to any IKE DIKE built west of hwy 146, is any of this true?

 

is there any proposal on the table to eliminate the Kemah, Bayview, Bacliff, and San Leon shore lines from the Ike Dike?

 

is the scenario of said rumor, I proposed above, is this one of the proposals?

 

as home owners, property owners, and business owners, we are concerned, and we have a right to know if this is a proposal or not?

 

a simple yes or no answer will do. ...

 

thank you,

 

kind regards,

 

terry

 

=====================

 

From: William Merrell

 

Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 4:38 PM To: Terry S. Singeltary Sr.

 

Cc: Cherie Coffman

 

Subject: RE: Ike Dike question ?

 

The 146 dike is proposed by the SSPEED Center at Rice. I agree with your ideas on it. The Ike Dike is a coastal spine which would protect everyone. Details on website http://www.tamug.edu/ikedike/

 

Best regards, Bill

 

William Merrell George P Mitchell Chair Texas A&M University at Galveston Po Box 1675 Galveston, Texas 77553-1675 409-740-4732 work 409-740-4787 fax 409-771-2225 cell

 

=====================

 

 From: Terry S. Singeltary Sr. [mailto:flounder9@verizon.net]

 

Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 12:50 PM

 

To: William Merrell

 

Subject: Ike Dike question ?

 

Greetings Dr. Merrell,

 

I am a bit concerned and confused, and hoping you might be able to help straighten out any confusion on the IKE DIKE.

 

i heard that one of the potential designs for the ike dike, would have everyone living south of the Kemah bridge on hwy 146, and everyone east of hwy 146 there from, i.e. Kemah, Bayview, Bacliff, and San Leon, all these fishing communities would be EAST OF SAID IKE DIKE, as the said IKE DIKE would be built west of hwy 146, thus leaving everyone east of 146 to be left for marsh land, as any hurricane after said IKE DIKE built would leave these fishing communities as marsh lands due to any IKE DIKE built west of hwy 146.

 

is any of this true ?

 

can you please show me where all the said potential designs and drawings might be for the public to view on any said IKE DIKE ?

 

thank you,

 

kindest regards, terry

 

 

===================

 

END...TSS

 

 

Dr. Merrell, a marine scientist from Texas A&M, will be talking about his proposal December 11, 2012 at 7 P.M. to explain his proposal, at a Town Hall Meeting in San Leon, Texas, at the San Leon Fire Station. ...

 

=====================================

 

see officials from surrounding Galveston Bayshore communities I have spoken with, and how they feel about the Rice SSPEED dike, VS the IKE dike by TAMU ;

 

 

Kemah Mayor

 

From: Bob Cummins Sent:

 

Monday, November 18, 2013 1:51 PM

 

To: Terry S. Singeltary Sr.

 

Cc: Rick Beverlin

 

Subject: RE: Is your community just collateral damage? RICE DIKE VS IKE DIKE

 

Mr. Singeltary, The City has Dr. Merrill speak on several occasions to help educate our citizens. We have sent letters to the state and federal bodies to show our support for the much needed Ike Dike. Dr. Merrell has spoken to every group in the Bay area and has done a great job to help all of us. If you know of anyway we can be of greater support of this cause please let me know. Respectfully, Mayor Bob Cummins City of Kemah

 

========================

 

Seabrook Mayor

 

From: Glenn Royal

 

Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 4:56 PM

 

To: 'Terry S. Singeltary Sr.'

 

Subject: RE: Is your community just collateral damage? RICE DIKE VS IKE DIKE

 

Dear Terry,

 

Rice University has not bothered to ask the opinion of Seabrook about the Centennial Gate. Had they asked, our reaction is similar to LaPorte. Prior to receiving your email, council has discussed our own resolution in opposition to this plan.

 

Recent discussions that I have had with area groups about the Centennial Gate give me hope that it is not going to be implemented given its relative cost versus storm surge protection. The Ike Dike gives us the greatest cost/benefit value.

 

Thank you for reaching out and sharing these articles with me. Please continue you to do so.

 

Best regards,

 

Glenn Royal

 

Mayor

 

City of Seabrook

 

========================

 

La Porte City Council At Large “A” councilman

 

From: John Zemanek

 

Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 1:58 PM

 

To: 'Terry S. Singeltary Sr.'

 

Subject: RE: Is your community just collateral damage? RICE DIKE VS IKE DIKE

 

Terry,

 

City passed resolution opposing the Rice Dike. If you hear anything down the road, please let us know. We are keeping our eyes & ears open as well. FYI, I am the At Large “A” councilman.

 

Regards,

 

John Zemanek

 

Zemanek Marine Services, Inc.

 

From: Terry S. Singeltary Sr. [mailto:flounder9@verizon.net]

 

Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 12:28 PM

 

To: mayorsoffice@laportetx.gov

 

Cc: atlargea@laportetx.gov; atlargeb@laportetx.gov; district1@laportetx.gov; cengelken@att.net; district3@laportetx.gov; district4@laportetx.gov; district5@laportetx.gov; district6@laportetx.gov

 

Subject: Is your community just collateral damage? RICE DIKE VS IKE DIKE

 

Say there Honorable Mayor Louis Rigby, and Council Members et al in the great city of LaPorte, Texas.

 

snip...end...tss

 

==============================

 

kind regards,

terry

 

 

Terry S. Singeltary Sr.

Bacliff, Texas 77518

Wednesday, March 11, 2015

MORGAN'S POINT GALVESTON BAY SHIP COLLISION UPDATE

UPDATE THURSDAY 8:44 AM

LA PORTE, Texas – The Houston Ship Channel was reopened Thursday morning, after responders completed initial salvage plans on a damaged chemical tanker and successfully moved the vessel to Barbour's Cut turning basin. The Carla Maersk incurred significant damage following a collision earlier in the week between it the and the Conti Peridot. Responders finished removing the liquid cargo from the ship’s two breached tanks early Thursday morning. The partial removal of cargo, Me...thyl Tertiary Butyl Ether, was a necessary step before the ship could be moved to a safe harbor. Plans also included checking the structural integrity of the vessel before moving it to another location. High-density foam was used to suppress flammable vapors from the damaged tanks on the Carla Maersk. Extensive air monitoring around the ship showed no sign of vapors seeping from the vessel. Responders continue to conduct air and water tests, which show no public health or environmental concerns. The Conti Peridot was moved Tuesday to the Port Authority’s Turning Basin terminal. "Safety of persons, environment and property continue to remain our highest priorities," said Capt. Brian Penoyer, Captain of the Port and Commander of Coast Guard Sector Houston-Galveston. "We will continue to keep you informed as efforts progress; and I would like to thank everyone involved with this Unified Command’s response." The cause of the collision remains under investigation. For claims call: 1-888-334-6446 For media inquiries call: 281-946-9437 Additional information is available at: ctcac.us <http://pier.me/5KH/>Photos and video can be accessed at: DVIDShub.net <http://pier.me/5KJ>





Dozens of ships delayed as section of Houston Ship Channel still closed: Pilots

 

in Port News 11/03/2015

 

Houston port 04.jpg More than 60 ships have been delayed since a section of the Houston Ship Channel was closed Monday following a vessel collision that caused MTBE to spill into the waterway, a Houston Pilots dispatcher said Tuesday.

 

The dispatcher said 35 inbound and 30 outbound vessels were in the queue late Tuesday afternoon.

 

The ship channel is closed to all traffic from the Fred Hartman Bridge to ship channel light 86 while salvage operations continue.

 

US Coast Guard Capt. Brian Penoyer said it was not yet possible to estimate when the section would reopen.

 

“I’d like to give an estimate that would be helpful, but we have to proceed step by step with the response,” he said. “Candidly, it has to be that way until we secure the vapor from the MTBE.”

 

About 12:40 pm CDT (1740 GMT) Monday, the chemical tanker Carla Maersk and dry bulker Conti Peridot collided just south of Morgan’s Point during a heavy fog. The impact pierced two cargo tanks on the Carla Maersk and MTBE began leaking into the ship channel.

 

Penoyer said there was little sign of MTBE on the water’s surface.

 

“With the single exception of a trace release from the damaged area of the hull on the Carla Maersk, we were unable to locate any evidence of sheen on the water,” he said.

 

The ship was carrying 216,000 barrels of the gasoline additive, but Penoyer said the entire cargo was not spilled as the crew was able to transfer MTBE out of the affected tanks and into other tanks on board.

 

The suspension of ship movements in the Houston Ship Channel impacts the delivery and loading schedules of crude oil and petroleum and petrochemical products. The 52-mile ship channel provides access from the Gulf of Mexico through Galveston Bay to various ports in Houston and other cities in the area that have many industrial facilities, including refineries and petrochemical plants. Source: Platts

 


 

 

 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 

DATE: March 11, 2015 2:38:11 PM CDT

 

Seafood Safety Notice

 

The Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) will issue “Fish and Shellfish Consumption Advisories” as needed during the Morgan’s Point Collision.

 

DSHS recommends that fishermen need to exercise common sense: do not eat fish or shellfish that has a chemical odor (similar to turpentine).

 

Q: Is the seafood safe to eat?

 

A: Recreationally caught fish and shellfish that do not smell like chemicals should be safe to eat. Persons who have a shellfish allergy should always avoid eating shrimp, crab, lobster, and oysters.

 

Q: Is fishing closed because of the MTBE release?

 

A: The DSHS has not closed any areas to the harvesting of fish, shrimp or crabs. People should always check the status of oyster harvesting areas prior to harvest. Further, MTBE does not build up in fish tissue, so there is not expected to be long-term effect on seafood in the area. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says studies have shown the chemical evaporates relatively quickly from surface water.

 

Q: Is seafood in restaurants and stores affected by the MTBE release?

 

A: There is no indication that seafood in the marketplace has been impacted by the MTBE release.

 

NOTE: For further inquires on Seafood Safety contact DSHS at: 512-776-7400 or the Seafood and Aquatic Life Group at: 512-834-6757.

 

For more information contact:

 

Morgan's Point Response JIC (281) 946-9437 MorgansPointResponse@gmail.com

 


 

 

Houston Ship Channel spill cleanup to take several days

 

By: Juan A. Lozano

 

Posted: 8:27 PM, Mar 10, 2015 Tag: state

 

LA PORTE — Efforts to clean up one of the nation's busiest seaports after a collision between two vessels on the Houston Ship Channel spilled a flammable chemical were expected to take at least several days, U.S. Coast Guard officials said Tuesday.

 

About a 4-mile to 8-mile stretch of the ship channel remained closed as crews worked to deal with the gasoline additive that spilled after two 600-foot ships collided on Monday in foggy conditions.

 

U.S. Coast Guard Capt. Brian Penoyer said the immediate goal is ensuring that there is no danger from the spilled additive — methyl tert-butyl ether or MTBE — as it is highly flammable and can be dangerous to people if inhaled in high doses. No injuries were reported from the collision.

 

Three cargo tanks of the chemical on the Danish-flagged Carla Maersk were ruptured when it collided with the Liberian bulk carrier Conti Peridot. A cause of the collision has not been determined. The Carla Maersk, which remains in the channel, was carrying approximately 216,000 barrels of MTBE before the collision but officials were still trying to determine how much had been spilled.

 

"We have to proceed step by step, making sure the flammability, the toxicity of this cargo is absolutely safe," said Penoyer, commander of the Houston-Galveston Coast Guard District. "We need to recognize this is an enormously complex salvage operation. ... We are driven by factors on the ground, not by a desired time frame. We all live here. We want to get back to business as usual. But we have to make sure people are safe."

 

Penoyer said officials have found no detectable concentrations of MTBE in the air in the shoreline communities around the spill since about midnight Monday and no sheens of the chemical have been found on the water.

 

"This indicates to us the risk to the public from toxic vapors or flammability of this cargo is virtually nil," he said.

 

There were no shelter-in-place orders on Tuesday for communities near the 50-mile channel that connects the Gulf of Mexico to the Port of Houston.

 

However, there was limited access into the Morgan's Point area, a city of about 350 residents located 30 miles east of Houston and adjacent to Galveston Bay at the entry point to the ship channel. The limited access included the area around Barbours Cut Container Terminal on the ship channel and at least one road into Morgan's Point, said Jeff Suggs, emergency management coordinator for the nearby city of La Porte.

 

The Port of Houston, a major part of the ship channel, is home to the nation's largest and one of the world's largest petrochemical complexes. It typically handles about 70 ships per day, plus 300 to 400 tugboats and barges, and consistently ranks first in the nation in foreign waterborne tonnage, U.S. imports and U.S. export tonnage.

 

The financial impact of the closure of the ship channel was not immediately known. But the Barbours Cut Container Terminal, run by the Port of Houston Authority, was closed on Tuesday due to the cleanup efforts.

 

On Tuesday, there were 28 ships waiting to go into the Houston Ship Channel and 24 waiting to come out, said Coast Guard Petty Officer Andy Kendrick.

 

Officials were also working to determine what kind of impact the spill might have on wildlife by taking and testing water samples, Penoyer said. The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and other agencies were helping with this effort.

 


 

 

Update: GBF has remained in contact throughout the day with the U.S. Coast Guard and Incident Command, and at this time there have been no reports of affected wildlife. As shown in this map, authorities continue to monitor air and water quality throughout and around the safety zone, but levels initially appear to show that there is no health concern to the public. As a reminder, if you see any chemical sheen or affected wildlife, please report it by phone to 281-842-8100 or online through GBF’s mobile reporting site: www.galvbay.org/GBAN

 

see Morgan’s Point Collision Situation Status Map

 

 


 

 

 

 

HOUSTON
OPEN WITH RESTRICTIONS OPEN WITH RESTRICTIONS
THE COTP HOUSTON/ GALVESTON HAS ESTABLISHED A SAFETY ZONE IN THE HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL FROM THE FRED HARTMAN BRIDGE TO HSC LIGHT 86 DUE TO COLLISION AND CHEMICAL SPILL. NO VESSEL MAY TRANSIT THE SAFETY ZONE." 03/10/2015

 

 

 


 

 

 

what’s going to happen when those great big super tankers start to show up after the Panama Canal is refitted and in full service and full steam ahead, and start cruising up the ship channel from Galveston to Houston, (besides the shoreline erosion there from)? we may have to start charging admission for the crash tanker derby show. set up the bleachers out on that new big GLIT island behind the house here. somebody better get a handle on why these collisions are happening, and fix it. fog has been here for some time, long before the ships https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiTsSGEhiVs

 

also, please, no more GLIT islands from the dredge either. dear steve has the definition for what a GLIT island is. I don’t know how much more of this our beloved Galveston Bay can handle. ...

 


 


 


 


 


 




 

 

flounder



 

 

 

Thursday, November 27, 2014

IKE DIKE VS RICE DIKE PUBLIC INPUT SOUGHT PLEASE WRITE IN SUPPORT OF TAMU IKE DIKE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 

Re: Gulf Coast Community Protection and Recovery District Hosts Public Information Session on October 9, 2014 at 2:00 p.m., Harris County Commissioners Court

 

CONTACT: Robert Eckels President, Gulf Coast Community Protection and Recovery District, Inc. Email: Info@gccprd.com

 

HOUSTON (October 10, 2014) – The Gulf Coast Community Protection and Recovery District (GCCPRD) held a public information session on Thursday, October 9, 2014 hosted by Harris County Judge Ed Emmett and GCCPRD President Robert Eckels. The session provided details about the GCCPRD Storm Surge Suppression Study.

 

Following three major hurricanes, the last of which (Hurricane Ike) was the most expensive in Texas’ history, Governor Perry issued an Executive Order creating the Governor’s Commission for Disaster Recovery and Renewal. One of the Commission’s recommendations was to conduct a study to determine how coastal communities can reduce the damage of future storms. In conjunction with that recommendation, Brazoria, Chambers, Galveston, Harris, Jefferson, and Orange Counties formed the GCCPRD as a local government corporation. The GCCPRD is leading the Storm Surge Suppression Study, a technical, scientific-based study funded to investigate opportunities to alleviate the vulnerability of the upper Texas coast to storm surge and flooding from events like Hurricane Ike. The study is funded by the Texas General Land Office through a $3.9 million federal Housing and Urban Development, Community Development Block Grant that was awarded in September 2013. Since then, the GCCPRD has been collecting data as well as analyzing existing studies and reports. This study is an opportunity for the GCCPRD to assume a leadership role and work collaboratively with federal, state, local, and public and private institutions to develop a comprehensive coastal protection plan that meets the needs of the region and the nation.

 

The Storm Surge Suppression Study will yield a variety of storm surge suppression alternatives that may consist of natural, structural, and nonstructural methods. Using these findings, the GCCPRD will recommend a cost-effective and efficient system of flood damage reduction and storm surge suppression measures to help protect the six-county region. It is anticipated that this study will conclude in fall 2016. Public feedback and participation is encouraged throughout the life of the study. Public scoping meetings will be held in winter 2014 and at key milestones in the study. Future large-scale public scoping meetings will be noticed in advance in local newspapers. For more information or to join the mailing list visit: http://www.gccprd.com/

 

About the Gulf Coast Community Protection and Recovery District (GCCPRD): The GCCPRD is a local government corporation governed by a Board of Directors comprised of the County Judge of each participating county and three additional appointed members serving three-year terms. Former Harris County Judge Robert Eckels was appointed by the Board to serve as President of the District. # # #

 

CONTACT:

 

Robert Eckels

President, Gulf Coast Community Protection and Recovery District, Inc.


 


 

IKE DIKE VS RICE DIKE INPUT SOUGHT FROM PUBLIC

 

Gulf Coast residents asked for ideas on surge suppression

 

December 3, 2014 chron.com

 

By Robert Stanton

 

The Gulf Coast Community Protection and Recovery District will host a series of public meetings in December to gain public feedback on protection from hurricanes as part of the state's Storm Surge Suppression Study, created by Gov. Rick Perry.

 

The first public meeting will take place from 6-8 p.m, Dec. 4 at League City Civic Center, 400 W. Walker St. in League City.

 

Others meetings will take place from 6-8 p.m. on Dec. 9 at J.D. Walker Community Center,

 

7613 Wade Road in Baytown;

 

and from 6-8 p.m. Dec. 11 at the Jefferson County Courthouse, 1001 Pearl St. in Beaumont.

 

Comments will be accepted at the public meetings and throughout the duration of the study.

 

Written comments may be mailed to the Gulf Coast Community Protection and Recovery District in care of Col. Christopher Salles at 3100 West Alabama St., Houston, Texas 77098 or emailed to info@gccprd.com.

 

"There are a number of different studies that are under way or in progress, and, they all offer part of the solution, but the efforts have not been coordinated and there are still gaps between the Work of the various studies," said district president Robert Eckels.

 

Two major ideas have emerged to prepare and protect the Houston-Galveston region from severe storms and hurricanes in the aftermath of Hurricane Ike in 2008.

 

No funding has been secured as of yet

 

Storms from page 1

 

Rice University's Severe Storm Prediction, Education and Evacuation from Disasters Center has proposed a Centennial Gate to provide storm-surge protection to the Houston Ship Channel.

 

The Centennial Gate near the Fred Hartman Bridge would protect industries along the Houston Ship Channel.

 

The Ike Dike proposed by Texas A&M University involves a coastal spine concept that would combine barriers and gates to keep storm surge out of internal waters.

 

Seabrook Mayor Glenn Royal said he supports the coastal storm surge suppression system plan, also known as the coastal spine - a 15- to 17- foot barrier that would stretch from High Island on Bolivar Peninsula to the San Luis Pass on Galveston's West End.

 

"We have to be ready and have a plan in place when we go ask for funding, which is estimated to be about $6 billion," Royal said. "We have to show that we're together, in unison, and have public buy-in." To date, no funding for post-Ike hurricane protection plans has been secured, which is why the upcoming public meetings are so important, Eckels said. Questions: 713-868-1043

 

chron.com

 


 

 

Greetings Gulf Coast Community Protection and Recovery District in care of Col. Christopher Salles, the Honorable Col. Salles Sir, Honorable GCCPRD President Judge Robert Eckels, Family, Friends, and Neighbors of the surrounding Galveston Bay complex.

 

I wish to kindly submit the following to Gulf Coast Community Protection and Recovery District in care of Col. Christopher Salles, the Honorable Col. Salles Sir, Honorable GCCPRD President Judge Robert Eckels, about said Hurricane protection proposals.

 

>>> Two major ideas have emerged to prepare and protect the Houston-Galveston region from severe storms and hurricanes in the aftermath of Hurricane Ike in 2008. <<<

 

THE BIG DIFFERENCE between the two proposals, the RICE SPPEED dike will NOT protect a great portion of Galveston County, and by the RICE SPPEED dike proposal own words ;

 

“Furthermore, this proposal leaves waterfront properties and communities east of SH- 146 vulnerable; however, it maintains the possibility of waterfront recreation and other environmental and natural coastal features.”

 

ALL the Rice SPPEED dike will do, is protect Houston and the Houston Ship channel and all it’s petro-chemical complex, by damming up the North end of Galveston bay and adding a 25 foot seawall down the west side of SH 146 from Baytown to Texas City, making a wasteland and next a recreational park for the rich to come play in, at the expense to tax payers. my biggest concern is the petro-chemical giants getting their way, with the rice SSPEED dike, at the tax payers expense, and that will be signing a death sentence for all of us when the next big one comes up the ship channel. you can’t dam us out, east of SH 146, and just draw a pretty picture replacing us, as the rice dike proposes, and what we all know would happen if you dam up the North end of Galveston bay, and building a 25 feet wall west of SH 146 on the old train tracks. it will be doom for La Porte, Seabrook, Kemah, Bayview, Bacliff, San Leon, up to Texas City, Texas. the Rice Dike is absolutely the wrong way to go. Vote for the Ike Dike T.A.M.U. ! if the petro chemical giants want a wall only to protect them, let them build it by themselves, not on the tax payers backs, and again, at the same time knowing what your signing is your own death certificate. you may as well write your Social Security number on your arms now if the Rice SSPEED Dike goes through. it could be grounds for litigations in courts for decades to come, deliberate loss of property and life, with intent. they knew would it would do from day one, because they drew a damn map drawing all of us out, and replacing us with ‘’waterfront recreation and other environmental and natural coastal features’’.

 

I am asking for the people of the surrounding Galveston Bay areas to please support the TAMU IKE DIKE, so we can all be protected, not just Houston, and the petro-chemical complex up the Houston Ship Channel.

 

please see my reference materials and evidence against the Rice SPPEED dike proposal as reference materials below...

 

REFERENCE MATERIALS

 

RICE SPPEED DIKE ALREADY HAS BIG PLANS FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY EAST OF SH 146 FROM BAYTOWN TO TEXAS CITY, TEXAS.

 

vote for the IKE dike, if we even will get a vote, and make sure to make the petro-chemical companies pay for their fair share of the protection from the _Ike_ dike proposal by TAMU.

 

if the Rice SSPEED dike is approved, the federal government should be forced to buy us all out, at top dollar. ...

 

see 25 foot damn along SH 146 ;


 
 
 
see how high the tide still was, two days after IKE, looking right into our garage and garage apartment, look how high the tide still is, WITHOUT THE RICE SPPEED DAM...dike.
 
 
can you imagine what that would look like with the north end of galveston bay dammed up, and a 25 ft. damn from La Porte to Texas City Texas ?
 
here was the tide the day before Ike from our pier, and please notice what the water level was then, compared to 2 days after Ike. (takes a minute to load, and 28 seconds into video, see water level)
 
 
 
see officials from surrounding Galveston Bayshore communities I have spoken with, and how they feel about the Rice SSPEED dike, VS the IKE dike by TAMU ;
 
 
Kemah Mayor

 

From: Bob Cummins Sent:

 

Monday, November 18, 2013 1:51 PM

 

To: Terry S. Singeltary Sr. Cc: Rick Beverlin

 

Subject: RE: Is your community just collateral damage? RICE DIKE VS IKE DIKE

 

Mr. Singeltary, The City has Dr. Merrill speak on several occasions to help educate our citizens. We have sent letters to the state and federal bodies to show our support for the much needed Ike Dike. Dr. Merrell has spoken to every group in the Bay area and has done a great job to help all of us. If you know of anyway we can be of greater support of this cause please let me know. Respectfully, Mayor Bob Cummins City of Kemah

 

========================

 

Seabrook Mayor

 

From: Glenn Royal

 

Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 4:56 PM

 

To: 'Terry S. Singeltary Sr.'

 

Subject: RE: Is your community just collateral damage? RICE DIKE VS IKE DIKE

 

Dear Terry,

 

Rice University has not bothered to ask the opinion of Seabrook about the Centennial Gate. Had they asked, our reaction is similar to LaPorte. Prior to receiving your email, council has discussed our own resolution in opposition to this plan.

 

Recent discussions that I have had with area groups about the Centennial Gate give me hope that it is not going to be implemented given its relative cost versus storm surge protection. The Ike Dike gives us the greatest cost/benefit value.

 

Thank you for reaching out and sharing these articles with me. Please continue you to do so.

 

Best regards,

 

Glenn Royal

 

Mayor

 

City of Seabrook

 

========================

 

La Porte City Council At Large “A” councilman

 

From: John Zemanek

 

Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 1:58 PM

 

To: 'Terry S. Singeltary Sr.'

 

Subject: RE: Is your community just collateral damage? RICE DIKE VS IKE DIKE

 

Terry,

 

City passed resolution opposing the Rice Dike. If you hear anything down the road, please let us know. We are keeping our eyes & ears open as well. FYI, I am the At Large “A” councilman.

 

Regards,

 

John Zemanek

 

Zemanek Marine Services, Inc.

 

From: Terry S. Singeltary Sr. [mailto:flounder9@verizon.net]

 

Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 12:28 PM

 


 

Cc: atlargea@laportetx.gov; atlargeb@laportetx.gov; district1@laportetx.gov; cengelken@att.net; district3@laportetx.gov; district4@laportetx.gov; district5@laportetx.gov; district6@laportetx.gov

 

Subject: Is your community just collateral damage? RICE DIKE VS IKE DIKE

 

Say there Honorable Mayor Louis Rigby, and Council Members et al in the great city of LaPorte, Texas.

 

snip...end...tss

 

==============================

 

RICE UNIVERSITY IKE DIKE hwy-146-levee proposal, THAT WOULD WASH AWAY SEABROOK, KEMAH, BAYVIEW, BACLIFF, AND SAN LEON

 

NOVEMBER 2011

 

Preliminary research results indicate that the most feasible structure will be a levee along SH-146 accompanied by pocket levees, built by private landowners. The levee would connect natural 25 foot elevations near the Houston Ship Channel and the Texas City Dike effectively protecting the properties and critical facilities and infrastructure west of SH-146. However, moveable barriers would need to be placed at Clear Lake and highway underpasses.

 

*** Furthermore, this proposal leaves waterfront properties and communities east of SH- 146 vulnerable; however, it maintains the possibility of waterfront recreation and other environmental and natural coastal features.

 


 

HERE is a IKE DIKE proposal that would help SAVE AND PROTECT SHOREACRES, SEABROOK, KEMAH, BAYVIEW, BACLIFF, AND SAN LEON.

 

THIS Ike Dike proposal by TAMU does NOT abandon all of us that have lived here all our lives, and this proposal does not sell out to developers ;

 


 

=====================

 

From: Terry S. Singeltary Sr.

 

Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 5:30 PM

 

To: William Merrell

 

Cc: Cherie Coffman

 

Subject: Re: Ike Dike question ? fantastic! thank you for your kind reply Sir, and explanation for the layperson such as me. many thanks, I like your proposal much, much, better Sir, considering my backyard is Galveston Bay here in Bacliff, 77518 shoreline. with that rice university plan, the shorelines from Kemah to San Leon and property values there from would tank and the next big one, we would all be marsh land. course, it would not matter much anyway, because that big toxic dredge island I have to look at everyday now, you know the one they propose to double in size now, well all that would be in our houses. ...what were they thinking. ...thanks again. with kindest regards, terry

 

=====================

 

From: William Merrell

 

Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 5:08 PM

 

To: Terry S. Singeltary Sr.

 

Cc: Cherie Coffman

 

Subject: RE: Ike Dike question ?

 

Again - the Dike you describe is proposed by Rice University. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the Ike Dike. The Ike Dike protects everyone in the Bay because it is along the coast. You can verify this and learn the details of the Ike Dike by going to our website

 


 

=====================

 

From: Terry S. Singeltary Sr. [mailto:flounder9@verizon.net]

 

Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 5:00 PM

 

To: William Merrell

 

Cc: Cherie Coffman

 

Subject: Re: Ike Dike question ?

 

Greetings again Dr. Merrell,

 

Sir, I had a question.

 

I did not have any ideas, other than the fact, I am concerned and confused on one of rumored proposals of Ike Dike, and we wanted to know the truth, and I was told, you were the person to go to, and my question was as follows ;

 

i heard that one of the potential designs for the ike dike, would have everyone living south of the Kemah bridge on hwy 146, and everyone east of hwy 146 there from, i.e. Kemah, Bayview, Bacliff, and San Leon, all these fishing communities would be EAST OF SAID IKE DIKE, as the said IKE DIKE would be built west of hwy 146, thus leaving everyone east of 146 to be left for marsh land, as any hurricane after said IKE DIKE built would leave these fishing communities as marsh lands due to any IKE DIKE built west of hwy 146, is any of this true?

 

is there any proposal on the table to eliminate the Kemah, Bayview, Bacliff, and San Leon shore lines from the Ike Dike?

 

is the scenario of said rumor, I proposed above, is this one of the proposals?

 

as home owners, property owners, and business owners, we are concerned, and we have a right to know if this is a proposal or not?

 

a simple yes or no answer will do. ...

 

thank you,

 

kind regards,

 

terry

 

=====================

 

From: William Merrell

 

Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 4:38 PM To: Terry S. Singeltary Sr.

 

Cc: Cherie Coffman

 

Subject: RE: Ike Dike question ?

 

The 146 dike is proposed by the SSPEED Center at Rice. I agree with your ideas on it. The Ike Dike is a coastal spine which would protect everyone. Details on website http://www.tamug.edu/ikedike/

 

Best regards, Bill

 

William Merrell George P Mitchell Chair Texas A&M University at Galveston Po Box 1675 Galveston, Texas 77553-1675 409-740-4732 work 409-740-4787 fax 409-771-2225 cell

 

=====================

 

From: Terry S. Singeltary Sr. [mailto:flounder9@verizon.net]

 

Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 12:50 PM

 

To: William Merrell

 

Subject: Ike Dike question ?

 

Greetings Dr. Merrell,

 

I am a bit concerned and confused, and hoping you might be able to help straighten out any confusion on the IKE DIKE.

 

i heard that one of the potential designs for the ike dike, would have everyone living south of the Kemah bridge on hwy 146, and everyone east of hwy 146 there from, i.e. Kemah, Bayview, Bacliff, and San Leon, all these fishing communities would be EAST OF SAID IKE DIKE, as the said IKE DIKE would be built west of hwy 146, thus leaving everyone east of 146 to be left for marsh land, as any hurricane after said IKE DIKE built would leave these fishing communities as marsh lands due to any IKE DIKE built west of hwy 146.

 

is any of this true ?

 

can you please show me where all the said potential designs and drawings might be for the public to view on any said IKE DIKE ?

 

thank you,

 

kindest regards, terry

 

===================

 

END...TSS

 

Dr. Merrell, a marine scientist from Texas A&M, will be talking about his proposal December 11, 2012 at 7 P.M. to explain his proposal, at a Town Hall Meeting in San Leon, Texas, at the San Leon Fire Station. ...

 

=====================================

 
Tuesday, August 5, 2014
 
Ike Dike Scientist Professor William Merrell sees NO chance of compromise !
 
BRAVO!!! Legislators want quick action on Ike Dike
 
 
 
Friday, December 6, 2013
 
IKE DIKE TAMU VS Rice SSPEED Dike Centennial gate from Hell
 
 
 
Sunday, December 9, 2012
 
 
*** RICE DIKE PROPOSAL COULD DESTROY GALVESTON BAY BAYSHORE COMMUNITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Thank You...

 

Respectfully,

 

Terry S. Singeltary Sr.

P.O. Box 42

Bacliff, Texas USA 77518