Greetings Family, Friends, and Neighbors of the Galveston Bay Communities, East of SH 146, from La Porte to Sunny San Leon, and everyone in-between.
after going over this 3rd part SSPEED RICE DIKE MID-BAY GATE proposal, I find this attempt at the same thing, futile.
not no, but HELL NO!
SSPEED RICE DIKE MID-BAY GATE
read and notice map drawing on page 25;
more smoke and mirrors folks, they are going to shove this Rice SSpeed dike, mid-bay gate, centennial gate, Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area, call it what ever you want, but they will shove it all down our throats one way or the other, and change this area as you have never seen it before, just to protect big oil and the petro chemical complex north of Fred Harman bridge, change that you do not want. I bet that’s the first thing they build is that centennial gate.
I don’t want to depend on oyster reefs and toxic dredge materials to protect us from the next big one.
your screwing up Galveston bay with this continued dredging of the Houston Ship Channel and materials there from used for islands, and then calling them and environmental marvel. I am not impressed.
this mid-bay gate plan still has the raising of SH 146 behind us, that would still wall off anyone east of SH 146.
The mid-bay gate and Centennial Gate, will leave everyone east of SH 146 as part of the berm levee protection system, protecting everyone west of SH 146, you will be part of that protection, washed up along side of the raised SH 146 as the backstop, and all those new developments across and west of SH 146 will be protected, but they will still use our old washed out homesteads, to make way for recreation, with this mid-bay gate proposal, same as what was originally proposed in the Rice Dike Proposal. WE ARE STILL COLLATERAL DAMAGE.
the mid-bay gate proposal, this idea will do nothing but screw this area up along east of SH 146, and Galveston Bay with it.
The mid-bay gate system is a band-aid approach that will not work for anyone East of SH 146, and I doubt it will work for Galveston Bay.
JUST SAY NO to the mid-bay gate plan, and NO to the Rise SSpeed dike Centennial Gate plan.
YES to the original TAMU Ike Dike plan ! The Ike Dike will protect us all as much as it can.
WE WANT THE IKE DIKE THAT WAS FIRST PROPOSED, it’s the most logical proposal.
This Rice SSpeed mid-bay, Centennial Gate plan, may look pretty on paper, but that dog still don’t hunt with me.
OUR HOMESTEADS WILL NOT BE COLLATERAL DAMAGE FOR THE BIG PETRO CHEMICAL NORTH OF FRED HARTMAN BRIDGE, just to make way for recreational parks and big money developers to move back in and build on our homesteads, your not going to put lipstick on this pig and get me to dance with her.
That’s my opinion.
Tuesday, September 1, 2015
IKE DIKE 3rd PROPOSAL CALLS FOR 'MID-BAY' GATE NEAR SAN LEON ACROSS TO SMITH POINT AREA
Sunday, April 5, 2015
Proposed Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area or Rice Dike Post Hurricane Land Grab in Disguise or Has There Been a Ike Dike Game Change Plan ?
Wednesday, August 12, 2015
GALVESTON BAY REPORT CARD 2015
Thursday, November 27, 2014
IKE DIKE VS RICE DIKE PUBLIC INPUT SOUGHT PLEASE WRITE IN SUPPORT OF TAMU IKE DIKE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, August 5, 2014
Ike Dike Scientist Professor William Merrell sees NO chance of compromise !
BRAVO!!! Legislators want quick action on Ike Dike
Friday, December 6, 2013
IKE DIKE TAMU VS Rice SSPEED Dike Centennial gate from Hell
Sunday, December 9, 2012
*** RICE DIKE PROPOSAL COULD DESTROY GALVESTON BAY BAYSHORE COMMUNITIES
Terry S. Singeltary Sr.